Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 4 |
Misconceptions | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Experimental Psychology | 2 |
Experiments | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 4 |
Author
Bader, Markus | 1 |
Ecker, Ullrich K. H. | 1 |
Griffiths, Thomas L. | 1 |
Lew, Timothy F. | 1 |
Lewandowsky, Stephan | 1 |
Meng, Michael | 1 |
Pashler, Harold E. | 1 |
Swire, Briony | 1 |
Vul, Edward | 1 |
Williams, Joseph J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
California | 1 |
Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bader, Markus; Meng, Michael – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Most current models of sentence comprehension assume that the human parsing mechanism (HPM) algorithmically computes detailed syntactic representations as basis for extracting sentence meaning. These models share the assumption that the representations computed by the HPM accurately reflect the linguistic input. This assumption has been challenged…
Descriptors: Sentences, Misconceptions, Comprehension, Models
Lew, Timothy F.; Pashler, Harold E.; Vul, Edward – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
What happens to memories as we forget? They might gradually lose fidelity, lose their associations (and thus be retrieved in response to the incorrect cues), or be completely lost. Typical long-term memory studies assess memory as a binary outcome (correct/incorrect), and cannot distinguish these different kinds of forgetting. Here we assess…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Long Term Memory, Learning, Visual Stimuli
Swire, Briony; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Lewandowsky, Stephan – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
People frequently continue to use inaccurate information in their reasoning even after a credible retraction has been presented. This phenomenon is often referred to as the continued influence effect of misinformation. The repetition of the original misconception within a retraction could contribute to this phenomenon, as it could inadvertently…
Descriptors: Information Utilization, Familiarity, Error Correction, Misconceptions
Williams, Joseph J.; Griffiths, Thomas L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Errors in detecting randomness are often explained in terms of biases and misconceptions. We propose and provide evidence for an account that characterizes the contribution of the inherent statistical difficulty of the task. Our account is based on a Bayesian statistical analysis, focusing on the fact that a random process is a special case of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Bias, Misconceptions, Statistical Analysis