Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Models | 2 |
Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
Serial Learning | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
Experimental Psychology | 1 |
Memory | 1 |
Word Lists | 1 |
Word Recognition | 1 |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
Brown, Gordon D. A. | 1 |
Hulme, Charles | 1 |
Neath, Ian | 1 |
Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W. | 1 |
Shostak, Lisa | 1 |
Stuart, George | 1 |
Surprenant, Aimee M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982
The buffer model proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin gives a valid measure of primary-memory capacity (i.e., the estimate is close to the true value), a property lacking in both the original Waugh and Norman method and Watkins' modifications of that method. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Memory, Models, Recall (Psychology)
Hulme, Charles; Neath, Ian; Stuart, George; Shostak, Lisa; Surprenant, Aimee M.; Brown, Gordon D. A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
The authors report 2 experiments that compare the serial recall of pure lists of long words, pure lists of short words, and lists of long or short words containing just a single isolated word of a different length. In both experiments for pure lists, there was a substantial recall advantage for short words; the isolated words were recalled better…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Experimental Psychology, Serial Learning, Recall (Psychology)