Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Age | 1 |
| Alumni | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Educational Attitudes | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Graduates | 1 |
| Occupational Aspiration | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Reputation | 1 |
| Scientists | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Higher Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMorrison, Emory; Rudd, Elizabeth; Zumeta, William; Nerad, Maresi – Journal of Higher Education, 2011
This paper unpacks how social science doctorate-holders come to evaluate overall excellence in their PhD training programs based on their domain-specific assessments of aspects of their programs. Latent class analysis reveals that social scientists 6-10 years beyond their PhD evaluate the quality of their doctoral program with one of two…
Descriptors: Social Sciences, Doctoral Programs, Social Scientists, Scientists
