Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Learning… | 3 |
Author
Botsas, George | 1 |
Elkins, John | 1 |
Frijters, Jan C. | 1 |
Fuchs, Douglas | 1 |
Lovett, Maureen W. | 1 |
Morgan, Paul L. | 1 |
Morris, Robin D. | 1 |
Padeliadu, Susana | 1 |
Sevcik, Rose A. | 1 |
Sideridis, Georgios D. | 1 |
Steinbach, Karen A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Illinois Test of… | 1 |
Kaufman Brief Intelligence… | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Frijters, Jan C.; Lovett, Maureen W.; Steinbach, Karen A.; Wolf, Maryanne; Sevcik, Rose A.; Morris, Robin D. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2011
This study reports on several specific neurocognitive process predictors of reading outcomes for a sample of 278 children with reading disabilities. Three categories of response (i.e., poor, average, and good) were formed via growth curve models of six reading outcomes. Two nested discriminant function analyses were conducted to evaluate the…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Intelligence Quotient, Intervention, Phonology
Sideridis, Georgios D.; Morgan, Paul L.; Botsas, George; Padeliadu, Susana; Fuchs, Douglas – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2006
We examined how strongly motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology acted as predictors of learning disabilities (LD). The results from five studies suggested that level of motivation (as shown through self-efficacy, motivational force, task avoidance, goal commitment, or self-concept) was highly accurate in classifying students with or at…
Descriptors: Psychopathology, Motivation, Self Efficacy, Metacognition

Elkins, John; Sultmann, William F. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
Seven discriminant analyses were performed with significant group separation occurring for six of these. Classification analyses indicated that using the 10 major subtests produced accurate classification in approximately 71 percent of cases. Results were discussed in the light of previous research methodologies and the debate as to the…
Descriptors: Classification, Discriminant Analysis, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities