NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
White, Margaret – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
An economical procedure for identifying the dyslexic child is described using a parent questionnaire, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (particularly noting behavioral idiosyncrasies), a brief sentence reading test, a brief spelling test, and lateralty tests. Procedures for synthesizing the evaluation information are considered.…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Dyslexia, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Obrzut, John E.; Hynd, George W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1987
Issues and developmental considerations in outcome and treatment of head injury in children are considered. Focus is on appropriate assessment practices in the areas of psychoeducational development, motor and cognitive deficits, and neuropsychological deficits. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Child Development, Clinical Diagnosis, Cognitive Development, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bigler, Erin D.; Lajiness-O'Neill, Renee; Howes, Nancy-Louise – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
Reviews recent neuroradiologic and brain imaging techniques in the assessment of learning disability. Technologies reviewed include computerized tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; electrophysiological and metabolic imaging; computerized electroencepholographic studies of evoked potentials, event-related potentials, spectral analysis, and…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Medical Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vellutino, Frank R.; Scanlon, Donna M.; Lyon, G. Reid – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000
This article discusses research on the traditional use of the IQ-achievement discrepancy to define specific reading disability. It highlights results from a study which found that IQ scores did not differentiate between poor readers who were found to be readily remediated and poor readers who were difficult to remediate. (Contains references.)…
Descriptors: Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavale, Kenneth A.; Forness, Steven R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000
This article critically analyzes available definitions of learning disability. The general problem of definition is discussed first, followed by a discussion of individual definitions from the earliest to the latest. It is concluded that the definitions fail to provide substantive insight into the nature of the condition. (Contains extensive…
Descriptors: Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raskin, Larry M.; Pitcher-Baker, Georgia – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Emotional Problems, Evaluation Methods, Exceptional Child Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Evans, Henryka M.; Seymour, Philip H. K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1999
An assessment of foundation processes was administered to 51 Scottish children with reading difficulties and to 56 reading-level-matched controls. Results suggested the foundation is in place by the reading age of 7 years and that foundation-level dyslexia is identifiable in children with reading difficulty whose reading ages fall below this…
Descriptors: Children, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Dyslexia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clark, Susan W.; Carver, Ronald P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
Three studies investigated the effectiveness of the Computer Assisted Reading Diagnosis, a diagnostic system based on "rauding" theory (a collection of theories, constructs, and equations developed to describe, explain, predict and control the ability to comprehend relatively easy sentences) and a causal model of reading achievement.…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Van den Broeck, Wim – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article argues that the regression-based discrepancy method used in the diagnosis of learning disabilities is invalid because it is inconsistent with the underlying underachievement concept of which it is intended to be the operationalization. It is mathematically demonstrated that the regression-based discrepancy method largely reflects…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Willson, Victor L.; Reynolds, Cecil R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article evaluates conclusions in Van den Broeck's article (2002) that argue the regression-based discrepancy method (RDM) used in learning disabilities diagnosis is invalid because it is inconsistent with the underlying underachievement concept of which it is intended to be the operationalization. It concludes acceptable models support the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Van den Broeck, Wim – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article responds to a critique by Willson and Reynolds (2002) that argued for the use of the regression-based discrepancy method (RDM) for identifying learning disabilities. It argues the statistical and theoretical counterarguments are based on a misreading of the statistical models presented. (Contains 8 references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lord-Maes, Janiece; Obrzut, John E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1996
This article discusses recent findings concerning cognitive outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children and adolescents, with a particular focus on age differences with TBI. It suggests a relationship between specific learning disorders and brain dysfunction, addresses differential hemispheric functioning with TBI, and outlines recent…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gordon, Michael – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
Discusses the discrepancies among physicians, psychologists, and schools regarding the diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit disorders. Stresses the need for all evaluations to include cross-disciplinary cooperation, and for the acceptance of standardized measures as part of the identification and treatment process. (CR)
Descriptors: Attention Deficit Disorders, Behavior Modification, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification