NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 17 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Elleman, Amy M.; Compton, Donald L.; Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Bouton, Bobette – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2011
In this study, the authors explore a newly constructed dynamic assessment (DA) intended to tap inference-making skills that they hypothesize will be predictive of future comprehension performance. The authors administered the test to 100 second-grade children using a dynamic format to consider the concurrent validity of the measure. The dynamic…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Validity, Reading Ability, Grade 2
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chin, Christopher E.; Ledesma, Heloise Marie L.; Cirino, Paul T.; Sevcik, Rose A.; Morris, Robin D.; Frijters, Jan C.; Lovett, Maureen W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was evaluated. Both measures were administered to 65 children (ages 6-7). Results suggest caution against using the K-BIT exclusively for placement and diagnostic purposes with young children with reading…
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Primary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kenny, Dianna T.; Chekaluk, Eugene – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1993
The concurrent validity of three types of reading ability assessments was evaluated with 312 Australian primary-level children. Results suggest that the nature of the skills required for success in reading changes in the primary years, and that both teacher-based and test-based assessments concur more closely as children progress through the…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Concurrent Validity, Foreign Countries, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oakland, Thomas; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1990
To identify classroom behaviors that differentiate primary-level students with learning disabilities (LD) from their nondisabled peers, two scales of 83 items each were devised and piloted. Two subscales and 18 individual items were found to discriminate students later classified as LD and those referred but not subsequently classified as LD.…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mann, Virginia A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1993
One hundred kindergarten children completed a phoneme segmentation test, an invented spelling test, and two tests of visual-motor ability. Scores on both tests of phoneme awareness predicted between 30% and 40% of variance in reading ability a year later, while visual-motor scores bore a less substantial relationship to future reading ability.…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Invented Spelling, Kindergarten, Phonemes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beatty, James R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities, Primary Education, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ritter, David R.; Ysseldyke, James E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1976
Investigated with 64 upper middle class first-grade children of normal intelligence and visual perception was the construct validity of the trait of visual figure-ground perception. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, General Education, Primary Education, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rafoth, Mary Ann K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The validity of using an analysis of patterns of performance on the Meeting Street School Screening test versus using the composite cutoff score for identification of learning disabilities was analyzed for 1,377 first graders. Use of subtest scatter predicted later learning disability placements less accurately than chance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Early Identification, Grade 1, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lowell, Robert E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
Descriptors: Predictive Measurement, Primary Education, Reading Readiness, Reading Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coleman, Margaret; Harmer, William R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The study compared selected subtests of commonly used standardized reading tests and informal placement procedures with 32 primary grade students in a summer reading tutor program. (SW)
Descriptors: Informal Assessment, Primary Education, Reading Difficulties, Reading Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hawthorne, Linda White; Larsen, Stephen C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Kindergarten, Learning Disabilities, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klanderman, John W.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1985
The study examined correlations between the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R), the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R), and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for 44 learning disabled primary and intermediate special class students. The Mental Processing and Achievement scales of K-ABC…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lindquist, Geraldine T. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The purpose of the study was to determine if the Weber (Utah) district screening program predicted the reading scores of 351 primary grade students. It was concluded that the screening program has very limited value in identifying children with learning problems. (Author)
Descriptors: High Risk Students, Learning Disabilities, Predictive Measurement, Primary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beatty, James R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
The construct validity of the Individual Learning Disabilities Classroom Screening Instrument was investigated for a sample of 61 learning disabled primary students. (CL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities, Primary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wood, Chip; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1984
Examination of the predictive validity of the Gesell School Readiness Screening Test with 84 kindergarten-age children found the procedure effective in predicting child success or failure in kindergarten and that within four-six years the chronological age of children entering kindergarten is unrelated to eventual success of failure in…
Descriptors: High Risk Persons, Kindergarten, Prediction, Primary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2