NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Journal of Learning…165
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Showing 46 to 60 of 165 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Worthington, George B., III; Bening, Mary Ellen – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The study found that the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) was valid in predicting reading, mathematics, and written expression for Black, Hispanic, and White male students referred for special education services. The K-ABC scores were not valid predictors, however, of written language achievement for referred females. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematics Achievement, Mild Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mann, Virginia A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1993
One hundred kindergarten children completed a phoneme segmentation test, an invented spelling test, and two tests of visual-motor ability. Scores on both tests of phoneme awareness predicted between 30% and 40% of variance in reading ability a year later, while visual-motor scores bore a less substantial relationship to future reading ability.…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Invented Spelling, Kindergarten, Phonemes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newcomer, Phyllis; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities, Psycholinguistics, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosner, Jerome; Simon, Dorothea P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Phonics, Test Construction, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
The study compared the performance of 18 elementary-age students with learning disabilities on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Correlations (corrected for restriction of range) between the two instruments were strong. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lindsay, G. A.; Wedell, K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The basic assumptions underlying the development of early identification procedures for at-risk children are reviewed. The effectiveness of screening measures designed to identify educationally "at-risk" children is critically examined. It is concluded that there is a general lack of evidence for the usefulness of such instruments. (Author)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, Screening Tests, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williamson, Wayne E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
The Stanford Achievement Test (SAT), 1973 edition, was administered concurrently with the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT), level 1, to 296 neurologically impaired and emotionally handicapped students to validate the WRAT (using the SAT as a criterion). (PHR)
Descriptors: Emotional Disturbances, Exceptional Child Research, Neurological Impairments, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tittemore, J. A.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1985
A learning disability index (LDI) based on a principal components analysis of the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised normative data has been developed to depict verbal or nonverbal deficits on that test. Ss (N=1550) referred for educational difficulties returned mean scores on the LDI that were reliably different from expected scores…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Test Validity, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huizinga, Raleigh J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Test Interpretation, Test Validity, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shinn, Mark; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
Analyses indicated that the poorer performance of learning disabled students on the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability, as compared to their performance on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, can be explained in terms of the kinds of behaviors sampled in the Woodcock-Johnson battery. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Performance Tests, Psychoeducational Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Espin, Christine A.; Shin, Jongho; Busch, Todd W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2005
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of curriculum-based measures as indicator of growth in content-area learning. Participants were 58 students in 2 seventh-grade social studies classes. CBM measures were student- and administrator-read vocabulary-matching probes. Criterion measures were performance on a knowledge…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Validity, Social Studies, Curriculum Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coy, Michael N. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Children, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Lucy Jane; Sprong, Tracy A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Ten psychometric criteria (such as item analysis, concurrent validity, and interexaminer reliability) were used to compare four preschool screening tests: "Comprehensive Identification Process", "Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning--Revised" (Dial--R), "Denver Developmental Screening Test", and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Item Analysis, Preschool Education, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edwards, R. Philip; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
The investigation provided no evidence that a diagnosis of minimal brain dysfunction based on a pediatric neurological evaluation and/or visual-motor impairment as measured by the Bender-Gestalt, is a useful predictor of academic achievement. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities, Neurological Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Winne, Phillip H.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
Using 60 fourth- to seventh-grade learning disabled (LD), normal, and gifted students, the comparability of representations of self-concept across groups was analyzed for the Sears and Coopersmith inventories. (Author/SW)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Gifted, Learning Disabilities, Self Concept
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11