Descriptor
Source
Journal of Memory and Language | 4 |
Author
Cook, Anne E. | 1 |
Malt, Barbara C. | 1 |
McCutchen, Deborah | 1 |
Myers, Jerome L. | 1 |
Pickering, M.J. | 1 |
Simner, J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Malt, Barbara C. – Journal of Memory and Language, 1985
Reports on four experiments on how differences in utterance relations influence understanding anaphors, that is, devices that refer back to previously mentioned words or concepts in a discourse. Findings suggest that readers may selectively keep information available if it is likely to be needed for interpreting subsequent input. (SED)
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Language Processing, Listening Comprehension, Memory
Simner, J.; Pickering, M.J. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2005
We investigate the planning of cause and consequence in language production by examining participants' continuations to discourse fragments in four experiments. Our studies indicate how the content of the continuation, and the association between the continuation and prior text, are influenced by the nature of prior discourse. People tend to…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Memory, Discourse Analysis, Speech Communication
Cook, Anne E.; Myers, Jerome L. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2004
Discourse context may affect comprehension of a word in a text by facilitating lexical access or by facilitating integration of the target concept with the preceding text. In two experiments, we used eye tracking measures to examine contextual influence on the integration of role fillers in scripted narratives. In both experiments, context had an…
Descriptors: Semantics, Eye Movements, Reading Processes, Memory

McCutchen, Deborah – Journal of Memory and Language, 1986
Presents a psycholinguistic analysis of the development of writing skills and reports a developmental study of knowledge effects in writing. A theoretical framework decomposes the requisite knowledge into three main components: (1) generalized, high-level problem-solving plans, (2) content, and (3) discourse. (Author/SED)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Structures, Cohesion (Written Composition), Content Analysis