Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 22 |
Descriptor
Familiarity | 26 |
Memory | 22 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 12 |
Recall (Psychology) | 7 |
Cues | 6 |
Models | 6 |
Cognitive Processes | 5 |
Experiments | 5 |
Semantics | 5 |
Tests | 5 |
Word Recognition | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Memory and Language | 26 |
Author
Gallo, David A. | 3 |
Oztekin, Ilke | 2 |
Anaki, D. | 1 |
Arndt, Jason | 1 |
Badre, David | 1 |
Ben-Shalom, D. | 1 |
Bodner, Glen E. | 1 |
Brainerd, C. J. | 1 |
Brown, Aaron A. | 1 |
Buchler, Norbou G. | 1 |
Cleary, Anne M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 26 |
Reports - Research | 18 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tibon, Roni; Vakil, Eli; Goldstein, Abraham; Levy, Daniel A. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
It has been proposed that the formation of episodic associations between stimuli may involve different processes when memoranda are from the same or different perceptual domains, and when stimuli are experienced concurrently or sequentially. Such differences are postulated to determine the degree of unitization of memoranda, and are asserted to…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Familiarity, Memory, Cognitive Development
Mickes, Laura; Seale-Carlisle, Travis M.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2013
Although frequently used with recognition, a few studies have used the Remember/Know procedure with free recall. In each case, participants gave Know judgments to a significant number of recalled items (items that were presumably not remembered on the basis of familiarity). What do these Know judgments mean? We investigated this issue using a…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Familiarity, Recall (Psychology), Task Analysis
Ryals, Anthony J.; Cleary, Anne M. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Among cues that fail to elicit successful recall, participants can still discriminate between cues that do and do not resemble studied items. This ability is referred to as recognition without cued recall (RWCR). We hypothesized that whereas recognition with cued recall is at least partly based on recalled studied information, RWCR results from a…
Descriptors: Cues, Test Items, Familiarity, Recognition (Psychology)
Mulligan, Neil W.; Picklesimer, Milton – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Dual-process models differentiate between two bases of memory, recollection and familiarity. It is routinely claimed that deeper, semantic encoding enhances recollection relative to shallow, non-semantic encoding, and that recollection is largely a product of semantic, elaborative rehearsal. The present experiments show that this is not always the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Familiarity
Re-Examining Dissociations between Remembering and Knowing: Binary Judgments vs. Independent Ratings
Brown, Aaron A.; Bodner, Glen E. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
When participants must classify their recognition experiences as remembering or knowing, variables often have dissociative effects on the two judgments. In contrast, when participants independently rate recollection "and" familiarity only parallel effects have been reported. To investigate this discrepancy we compared the effects of masked priming…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Classification, Memory, Knowledge Level
Oztekin, Ilke; Gungor, Nur Zeynep; Badre, David – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
The response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure was used to provide an in-depth investigation of the impact of aging on the dynamics of short-term memory retrieval. Young and older adults studied sequentially presented 3-item lists, immediately followed by a recognition probe. Analyses of composite list and serial position SAT…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Older Adults, Serial Ordering, Short Term Memory
Scimeca, Jason M.; McDonough, Ian M.; Gallo, David A. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
Memories have qualitative properties (e.g., the different kinds of features or details that can be retrieved) and quantitative properties (e.g., the frequency and/or strength of retrieval). Here we investigated the relative contribution of these two properties to the retrieval monitoring process. Participants studied a list of words, and memory…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Comparative Analysis, Stimuli
Memory for Items and Associations: Distinct Representations and Processes in Associative Recognition
Buchler, Norbou G.; Light, Leah L.; Reder, Lynne M. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
In two experiments, participants studied word pairs and later discriminated old (intact) word pairs from foils, including recombined word pairs and pairs including one or two previously unstudied words. Rather than making old/new memory judgments, they chose one of five responses: (1) Old-Old (original), (2) Old-Old (rearranged), (3) Old-New, (4)…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Experiments, Associative Learning
Joordens, Steve; Ozubko, Jason D.; Niewiadomski, Marty W. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
In his analysis of the pseudoword effect, [Greene, R.L. (2004). Recognition memory for pseudowords. "Journal of Memory and Language," 50, 259-267.] suggests nonwords can feel more familiar that words in a recognition context if the orthographic features of the nonword match well with the features of the items presented at study. One possible…
Descriptors: Test Items, Familiarity, Recognition (Psychology), Experimental Psychology
Gallo, David A.; Meadow, Nathaniel G.; Johnson, Elizabeth L.; Foster, Katherine T. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Thinking about the meaning of studied words (deep processing) enhances memory on typical recognition tests, relative to focusing on perceptual features (shallow processing). One explanation for this levels-of-processing effect is that deep processing leads to the encoding of more distinctive representations (i.e., more unique semantic or…
Descriptors: Semantics, Memory, Familiarity, Heuristics
Brainerd, C. J.; Reyna, V. F. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
When recognition probes seem familiar but their presentation cannot be recollected, dual-process models predict that they will be attributed to too many presentation contexts--most dramatically, to multiple contexts that are mutually contradictory. This is the phenomenon of episodic over-distribution. In the conjoint-recognition and…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Models, Cognitive Processes
Arndt, Jason; Lee, Karen; Flora, David B. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Three experiments examined whether the representations underlying recognition memory familiarity can be episodic in nature. Recognition without identification [Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification. "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition," 26, 1063-1069; Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1990).…
Descriptors: Test Items, Familiarity, Identification, Recognition (Psychology)
Healy, Alice F.; Shea, Kathleen M.; Kole, James A.; Cunningham, Thomas F. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Three experiments examined the effects of position distinctiveness, item familiarity, and frequency of presentation on serial position functions in a task involving reconstructing the order of a subset of 12 names in a list of 20 names. Three different serial position conditions were compared in which the subset of names occurred in Positions…
Descriptors: Memory, Familiarity, Serial Ordering, Experiments
Oztekin, Ilke; McElree, Brian – Journal of Memory and Language, 2007
The response-signal speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) procedure was used to investigate how proactive interference (PI) affects retrieval from working memory. Participants were presented with 6-item study lists, followed immediately by a recognition probe. A variant of a release from PI design was used: All items in a list were from the same semantic…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Recognition (Psychology), Short Term Memory
Woodward, Amelia J.; Macken, William J.; Jones, Dylan M. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Enhanced serial recall for linguistically familiar material is usually attributed to a process of item redintegration. The possibility tested here is that familiarity influences memory at the sequence level by enhancing the fluency with which items may be assembled into sequences. Experiment 1 showed that with practice, serial recall of nonwords…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Familiarity, Short Term Memory, Recall (Psychology)
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2