NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Strijkers, Kristof; Holcomb, Phillip J.; Costa, Albert – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
The present study explored when and how the top-down intention to speak influences the language production process. We did so by comparing the brain's electrical response for a variable known to affect lexical access, namely word frequency, during overt object naming and non-verbal object categorization. We found that during naming, the…
Descriptors: Evidence, Intention, Classification, Brain
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nozari, Nazbanou; Dell, Gary S. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2009
The lexical bias effect (the tendency for phonological speech errors to create words more often than nonwords) has been debated for over 30 years. One account attributes the effect to a lexical editor, a strategic component of the production system that examines each planned phonological string, and suppresses it if it is a nonword. The…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Oral Language, Editing, Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emmorey, Karen; Bosworth, Rain; Kraljic, Tanya – Journal of Memory and Language, 2009
The perceptual loop theory of self-monitoring posits that auditory speech output is parsed by the comprehension system. For sign language, however, visual input from one's own signing is distinct from visual input received from another's signing. Two experiments investigated the role of visual feedback in the production of American Sign Language…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Deafness, American Sign Language, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bard, E. G.; Anderson, A. H.; Chen, Y.; Nicholson, H. B. M.; Havard, C.; Dalzel-Job, S. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2007
Three accounts of common ground maintenance make different assumptions about speakers' responsibilities regarding listener-privileged information. Duplicated responsibility requires each interlocutor to assimilate the other's knowledge before designing appropriate utterances. Shared responsibility appeals to least collaborative effort [Clark, H.…
Descriptors: Cues, Cognitive Development, Memory, Task Analysis