NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)29
Source
Journal of MultiDisciplinary…29
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 29 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
In this paper, the author talks about Faster Forward Fund (3F). The basic idea of 3F is to provide support for three approaches within the evaluation field that are not the main foci of AEA activities, or of any other organization as far as is known: (1) to develop ideas that show promise for significantly accelerating the theory or practice of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluation Utilization, Financial Support, Innovation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lam, Tony Chiu Ming; Kolomitro, Klodiana; Alamparambil, Flanny C. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
Background: Empathy is an individual's capacity to understand the behavior of others, to experience their feelings, and to express that understanding to them. Empathic ability is an asset professionally for individuals, such as teachers, physicians and social workers, who work with people. Being empathetic is also critical to our being able to…
Descriptors: Empathy, Training Methods, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
In this paper, the author considers certain aspects of the problem of obtaining unbiased information about the merits of a program or product, whether for purposes of decision making or for accountability. The evaluation of personnel, as well as the evaluation of proposals and evaluations, generally involves a different set of problems than those…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Test Bias, Personnel Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campbell, Donald T. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
It is a special characteristic of all modern societies that people consciously decide on and plan projects designed to improve their social systems. It is their universal predicament that their projects do not always have their intended effects. It seems inevitable that in most countries this common set of problems, combined with the obvious…
Descriptors: Social Planning, Social Systems, Social Change, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sanders, James R.; Nafziger, Dean N. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
The purpose of this paper is to provide a basis for judging the adequacy of evaluation plans or, as they are commonly called, evaluation designs. The authors assume that using the procedures suggested in this paper to determine the adequacy of evaluation designs in advance of actually conducting evaluations will lead to better evaluation designs,…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Program Evaluation, Research Design, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nowakowski, Jeri Ridings – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
This article presents an interview with Ralph Tyler. This interview will be of interest to those entering the field of education as well as for those who have made their home within the field for some time now. In the interview, Dr. Tyler discusses work in education and educational evaluation that spans over a half a century. He describes issues…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Interviews, Educational Research, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
Good evaluation requires that evaluation efforts themselves be evaluated. Many things can and often do go wrong in evaluation work. Accordingly, it is necessary to check evaluations for problems such as bias, technical error, administrative difficulties, and misuse. Such checks are needed both to improve ongoing evaluation activities and to assess…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cooksy, Leslie J.; Caracelli, Valerie J. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2009
This paper examines the practice of metaevaluation as indicated by the Metaevaluation standard of the Program Evaluation Standards, as the evaluation of a specific evaluation to inform stakeholders about the evaluation's strengths and weaknesses. The findings from an analysis of eighteen metaevaluations, including a description of the data…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Standards, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Russon, Craig – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
Teaching on the philosophies of evaluation as part of a pilot introductory course of a new diploma programme jointly sponsored by the United Nations (UN) Evaluation Group and the United Nations Staff College, the author compared and contrasted the "rationalistic" paradigm with the "naturalistic" paradigm on the basis of ontology, epistemology, and…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Epistemology, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the author distinguishes between evaluation and other cognitive processes. He looks at unpacking evaluation into component processes to avoid confusion that hampers effective evaluation work, and to provide a foundation for an epistemology and logic of evaluation. The author advocates that evaluation is a compressed representation…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Epistemology, Summative Evaluation, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2007
Noting that there has been extensive discussion of the relation of evaluation to: (1) research; (2) explanations (a.k.a. theory-driven, logic model, or realistic evaluation); and (3) recommendations, the author introduces: (4) prediction. He advocates that unlike the first three concepts, prediction is necessarily part of most kinds of evaluation,…
Descriptors: Prediction, Logical Thinking, Predictive Validity, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Richardson, Margaret M. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
2008 marks the fifth year of publication for the Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE). The growth of JMDE, whether measured in terms of readership or in the evolution of ideas, reflects the increasing importance of evaluation, not as a separate process, but more as the development of an evaluative state of mind. Just in terms of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Journal Articles, Periodicals, Bibliometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walser, Tamara M.; Bridges, Keith; Mattingly, Kate – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
Charter Theatre is a small professional theatre in Washington, DC. Its mission is to develop and produce new plays. Like other organizations, Charter Theatre wants to be accountable. Its members saw early the need for evaluation--a repeatable process to assure the quality of their work, and have infused their development process with evaluation.…
Descriptors: Theater Arts, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peck, Laura R.; Gorzalski, Lindsey M. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2009
Background: Research on evaluation use focuses on putting evaluation recommendations into practice. Prior theoretical research proposes varied frameworks for understanding the use (or lack) of program evaluation results. Purpose: Our purpose is to create and test a single, integrated framework for understanding evaluation use. This article relies…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Intervention, Program Evaluation, Content Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
This review focuses on what the author terms a reconsideration of the working credentials of the randomly controlled trial (RCT) design, and includes a discussion of popularly accepted aspects as well as some new perspectives. The author concludes that there is nothing either Imperative or superior about the need for RCT designs, and that an…
Descriptors: Credentials, Research Design, Summative Evaluation, Quasiexperimental Design
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2