NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sanacore, Joseph – Journal of Reading, 1994
Notes that, although informal comments by teachers regarding building principals and other reading leaders are important, formal feedback from a survey or questionnaire helps to objectify the evaluation process and to provide principals with a more complete picture. Presents a survey for teacher evaluation of reading leaders. Offers suggestions…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Secondary Education, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sebesta, Sam L.; And Others – Journal of Reading, 1995
Describes a hierarchy intended to interpret and promote students' aesthetic responses to literature. Finds that students in grades 7 through 10, in contrast to younger readers, have moved into reflective thinking and evaluation. (SR)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Literature Appreciation, Reader Response, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miholic, Vincent – Journal of Reading, 1994
Presents an inventory intended to make junior high through college students think about what they do while reading and help them become aware of metacognitive strategies. Suggests that the inventory may provide teachers with at least some basic ideas of what their students know with respect to achieving higher levels of comprehension. (RS)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Metacognition, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keefe, Donald; Meyer, Valerie – Journal of Reading, 1988
Describes a project which ranked over 100 adult disabled readers by ability level. Provides profiles of disability types, and makes suggestions for teaching strategies appropriate to each level. (ARH)
Descriptors: Adult Basic Education, Adult Literacy, Adult Reading Programs, Reading Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Webb, Melvin W., II – Journal of Reading, 1983
Uses a scale to analyze three tests used for assessing community college students' reading levels: The Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (SDRT), the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT), and the Iowa Silent Reading Tests (ISRT). Judges the ISRT to be the best and the NDRT to be unacceptable according to the criteria of the scale. (FL)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Measures (Individuals)