NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pumfrey, P. D.; Fletcher, J. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1989
Examines syntactic, semantic and grapho-phonic miscues made by early readers of varying ability. Finds that (1) passage complexity affects use of syntactic and semantic cues; (2) high and above average students' miscue quality deteriorates as text complexity increases; and (3) higher word recognition scores relate to effective use of grapho-phonic…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cues, Miscue Analysis, Primary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donald, D. R. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1980
Presents reasons for the current upsurge in interest in oral reading errors, including theoretical shifts in how the process of learning to read is to be viewed and evaluated. Stresses the difference between descriptive and linguistic error analysis and develops leads that have emerged from studies using linguistic error analysis. (Author/FL)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Cues, Miscue Analysis, Oral Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Campbell, Robin – Journal of Research in Reading, 1987
Describes a study of oral reading errors by six-year-olds indicating that previously read words are frequently substituted at points of miscue, but that reliance on this source decreased over the year, casting doubt on previously postulated developmental phases of reading. (HTH)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Decoding (Reading), Developmental Stages, Error Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wong, Mei Yin; Underwood, Geoffrey – Journal of Research in Reading, 1996
Investigates whether 11-year-old children in Singapore, from English Dominant or English Non-Dominant backgrounds, read better orally when words were presented in list or text. Finds that readers with less exposure to English relied more on contextual information than more experienced readers, and that reading miscues varied according to whether…
Descriptors: Bilingual Students, Comparative Analysis, Error Analysis (Language), Family Environment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beveridge, M.; Griffiths, V. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1987
Suggests that, in the majority of the aspects of the reading process examined, there was a statistically significant interaction between illustration and difficulty levels. Finds that reading performance in the illustrated conditions was superior to that in the unillustrated conditions at the lower level of difficulty. (JD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Error Patterns, Illustrations, Miscue Analysis