Descriptor
Source
Journal of Research in… | 4 |
Author
Hall, Donald A. | 1 |
Lunetta, Vincent N. | 1 |
McCurdy, Donald W. | 1 |
Morgan, Ashley G. | 1 |
Pringle, Rhodell G. | 1 |
Tamir, Pinchas | 1 |
Wareing, Carol | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Pringle, Rhodell G.; Morgan, Ashley G. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978
Uses a Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) as an indicator of field-independency in an investigation with college graduate students. Results reveal that GEFT scores were not affected by the treatment of 18 hours of instruction in Science Curriculum Improvement Study (SCIS) materials or by pretesting effects. (CP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests, Educational Research, Laboratory Experiments

Tamir, Pinchas; Lunetta, Vincent N. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978
Reports on the administration of a biology cognitive preference test to 177 science-oriented high school students. Subjects were asked to rank responses or "extension statements" to items according to their preference. It was found that the high-ability students as a group had a very high preference for questioning and low preference for recall.…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Biology, Cognitive Processes, Educational Research

Wareing, Carol – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981
This study examined whether a relationship existed between field-dependence-independence and scientific attitudes of sixth-grade students in SCIS. Findings indicated that such a relationship was not statistically significant. (Author/DS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education

Hall, Donald A.; McCurdy, Donald W. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1990
Compared is an inquiry-oriented Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) style laboratory approach with a more directive traditional approach on student outcomes in the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Differences in science achievement, reasoning ability, attitude, and stages of development are discussed. (KR)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, College Science