Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 1 |
| Competence | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| English Language Learners | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Science Process Skills | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Research in… | 1 |
Author
| Brian M. Donovan | 1 |
| Christopher D. Wilson | 1 |
| Jonathan F. Osborne | 1 |
| Kevin C. Haudek | 1 |
| Marisol M. Santiago | 1 |
| Molly A. M. Stuhlsatz | 1 |
| Tina Cheuk | 1 |
| Xiaoming Zhai | 1 |
| Zoë E. Buck Bracey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California (San Francisco) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChristopher D. Wilson; Kevin C. Haudek; Jonathan F. Osborne; Zoë E. Buck Bracey; Tina Cheuk; Brian M. Donovan; Molly A. M. Stuhlsatz; Marisol M. Santiago; Xiaoming Zhai – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2024
Argumentation is fundamental to science education, both as a prominent feature of scientific reasoning and as an effective mode of learning--a perspective reflected in contemporary frameworks and standards. The successful implementation of argumentation in school science, however, requires a paradigm shift in science assessment from the…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Competence, Science Process Skills, Persuasive Discourse
