NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Sufen; Chang, Wen-Hua; Lieu, Sang-Chong; Kao, Huey-Lien; Huang, Mao-Tsai; Lin, Shu-Fen – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013
This study developed an empirically based questionnaire to monitor young learners' conceptions of nature of science (NOS). The questionnaire, entitled Students' Ideas about Nature of Science (SINOS), measured views on theory-ladenness, use of creativity and imagination, tentativeness of scientific knowledge, durability of scientific knowledge,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Questionnaires, Scientific Attitudes, Childhood Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benson, Bernard W.; Young, Linda L. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1971
Describes validation procedures used with an individually administered test involving a branching program format to assess students level of cognitive achievement in biology. Reports results of comparisons of classes of teachers with BSCS or non-BSCS backgrounds. (AL)
Descriptors: Biology, Cognitive Measurement, Individual Testing, Secondary School Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ward, Charles R.; And Others – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981
Evaluated is the Longeot test, a paper and pencil test designed to measure various aspects of formal and concrete operational thought. Information from over 500 subjects (ages 17 to 20) indicated the test to be reliable and classifications from it correlated with classifications mode using Piagetian tasks. (DS)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Chemistry, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tschopp, Jill K.; Kurdek, Lawrence A. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981
Explored the relationship between high school students' (N=37) performances on the Tomlinson-Keasey and Campbell paper-and-pencil test of formal operations and a set of traditional, individually administered, Piagetian developmental tasks. Correlations between the traditional, formal operations tasks and paper-and-pencil tests were low. (Author/DS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Testing