Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 6 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
| Writing Evaluation | 6 |
| Essays | 5 |
| Scoring | 5 |
| Writing Tests | 5 |
| Test Scoring Machines | 4 |
| Educational Technology | 3 |
| Essay Tests | 3 |
| Interrater Reliability | 3 |
| Student Evaluation | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Technology,… | 6 |
Author
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Ben-Simon, Anat | 1 |
| Bennett, Randy Elliott | 1 |
| Brown, Michelle Stallone | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Dexter, Sara | 1 |
| Dikli, Semire | 1 |
| Garcia, Veronica | 1 |
| Riedel, Eric | 1 |
| Rudner, Lawrence M. | 1 |
| Scharber, Cassandra | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkScharber, Cassandra; Dexter, Sara; Riedel, Eric – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2008
The purpose of this research is to analyze preservice teachers' use of and reactions to an automated essay scorer used within an online, case-based learning environment called ETIPS. Data analyzed include post-assignment surveys, a user log of students' actions within the cases, instructor-assigned scores on final essays, and interviews with four…
Descriptors: Test Scoring Machines, Essays, Student Experience, Automation
Wang, Jinhao; Brown, Michelle Stallone – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
The current research was conducted to investigate the validity of automated essay scoring (AES) by comparing group mean scores assigned by an AES tool, IntelliMetric [TM] and human raters. Data collection included administering the Texas version of the WriterPlacer "Plus" test and obtaining scores assigned by IntelliMetric [TM] and by…
Descriptors: Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Comparative Testing, Intermode Differences
Ben-Simon, Anat; Bennett, Randy Elliott – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
This study evaluated a "substantively driven" method for scoring NAEP writing assessments automatically. The study used variations of an existing commercial program, e-rater[R], to compare the performance of three approaches to automated essay scoring: a "brute-empirical" approach in which variables are selected and weighted solely according to…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays
Rudner, Lawrence M.; Garcia, Veronica; Welch, Catherine – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
This report provides a two-part evaluation of the IntelliMetric[SM] automated essay scoring system based on its performance scoring essays from the Analytic Writing Assessment of the Graduate Management Admission Test[TM] (GMAT[TM]). The IntelliMetric system performance is first compared to that of individual human raters, a Bayesian system…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays
Dikli, Semire – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is defined as the computer technology that evaluates and scores the written prose (Shermis & Barrera, 2002; Shermis & Burstein, 2003; Shermis, Raymat, & Barrera, 2003). AES systems are mainly used to overcome time, cost, reliability, and generalizability issues in writing assessment (Bereiter, 2003; Burstein,…
Descriptors: Scoring, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Standardized Tests
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
E-rater[R] has been used by the Educational Testing Service for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (V.2) that is different from other automated essay scoring systems in several important respects. The main innovations of e-rater V.2 are a small, intuitive, and meaningful set of features used for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
