Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Individual Differences | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Aptitude Tests | 1 |
Career Choice | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Copyrights | 1 |
Equal Opportunities (Jobs) | 1 |
Generalization | 1 |
High School Students | 1 |
Intelligence | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Vocational Behavior | 3 |
Author
Allison, Wyndolyn | 1 |
Armstrong, Patrick Ian | 1 |
Rounds, James | 1 |
Schaefer, Barbara E. | 1 |
Schmidt, Frank L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Self Directed Search | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Armstrong, Patrick Ian; Allison, Wyndolyn; Rounds, James – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2008
Although commercially developed interest measures based on Holland's RIASEC types are effectively used in a variety of applied settings, these measures have somewhat limited research utility due to their length and copyright restrictions placed by the test publishers. In the present study, two sets of 8-item RIASEC scales were developed using…
Descriptors: College Students, Copyrights, Validity, Vocational Interests

Schaefer, Barbara E. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1976
This study was designed to investigate the differential effectiveness of Holland's Self Directed Search (SDS) as a vocational guidance tool for 166 junior-class students in a suburban regional high school. Congruence scores were developed for each student and were then compared to four variables. Results are discussed. (Author/EJT)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Career Choice, High School Students, Individual Differences

Schmidt, Frank L. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988
Draws from validity generalization research to summarize evidence disputing theories that objective employment tests are either biased against minorities or lack utility. Argues that group differences in test scores do not result from deficiencies in tests, but in skills they measure. Suggests that measurement-based research does not provide…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Generalization, Individual Differences