Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Animals | 7 |
Probability | 7 |
Reinforcement | 7 |
Intervals | 6 |
Experiments | 3 |
Responses | 3 |
Behavior Theories | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Operant Conditioning | 2 |
Stimuli | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of the Experimental… | 7 |
Author
Davison, Michael | 7 |
Elliffe, Douglas | 3 |
Nevin, John A. | 2 |
Shahan, Timothy A. | 2 |
Baum, William M. | 1 |
Boutros, Nathalie | 1 |
Elliffe, Douglas M. | 1 |
Krageloh, Christian U. | 1 |
Landon, Jason | 1 |
Marr, M. Jackson | 1 |
Odum, Amy L. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Boutros, Nathalie; Elliffe, Douglas; Davison, Michael – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011
Reinforcers may increase operant responding via a response-strengthening mechanism whereby the probability of the preceding response increases, or via some discriminative process whereby the response more likely to provide subsequent reinforcement becomes, itself, more likely. We tested these two accounts. Six pigeons responded for food…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Probability, Animals, Evaluation Methods
Davison, Michael; Elliffe, Douglas; Marr, M. Jackson – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2010
Four pigeons were trained on two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with no changeover delay. In Phase 1, relative reinforcers on the two alternatives were varied over five conditions from 0.1 to 0.9. In Phases 2 and 3, we instituted a molar feedback function between relative choice in an interreinforcer interval and the probability of…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Animals, Animal Behavior, Reinforcement
Elliffe, Douglas; Davison, Michael; Landon, Jason – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
One assumption of the matching approach to choice is that different independent variables control choice independently of each other. We tested this assumption for reinforcer rate and magnitude in an extensive parametric experiment. Five pigeons responded for food reinforcement on switching-key concurrent variable-interval variable-interval…
Descriptors: Criteria, Statistical Analysis, Reinforcement, Models
Nevin, John A.; Davison, Michael; Odum, Amy L.; Shahan, Timothy A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2007
A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations (Nevin, Davison, & Shahan, 2005) is extended to working memory in delayed matching to sample by adding terms for disruption of attending during the retention interval. Like its predecessor, the theory assumes that reinforcers and disruptors affect the independent probabilities…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Attention, Reinforcement, Short Term Memory
Krageloh, Christian U.; Davison, Michael; Elliffe, Douglas M. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
We investigated the effects that sequences of reinforcers obtained from the same response key have on local preference in concurrent variable-interval schedules with pigeons as subjects. With an overall reinforcer rate of one every 27 s, on average, reinforcers were scheduled dependently, and the probability that a reinforcer would be arranged on…
Descriptors: Intervals, Animals, Probability, Experiments
Baum, William M.; Davison, Michael – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2004
Molar and molecular views of behavior imply different approaches to data analysis. The molecular view privileges moment-to-moment analyses, whereas the molar view supports analysis of more and less extended activities. In concurrent performance, the molar view supports study of both extended patterns of choice and more local patterns of visiting…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Data Analysis, Cues, Animals
Nevin, John A.; Davison, Michael; Shahan, Timothy A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
A model of conditional discrimination performance (Davison & Nevin, 1999) is combined with the notion that unmeasured attending to the sample and comparison stimuli, in the steady state and during disruption, depends on reinforcement in the same way as predicted for overt free-operant responding by behavioral momentum theory (Nevin & Grace, 2000).…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Behavior Problems, Stimuli, Probability