NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Everly, Jessica B.; Perone, Michael – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
Although response-dependent shock often suppresses responding, response facilitation can occur. In two experiments, we examined the suppressive and facilitative effects of shock by manipulating shock intensity and the interresponse times that produced shock. Rats' lever presses were reinforced on a variable-interval 40-s schedule of food…
Descriptors: Animals, Experiments, Animal Behavior, Punishment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Urcuioli, Peter J.; Swisher, Melissa – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
Pigeons trained on successive AB symbolic matching show emergent BA antisymmetry if they are also trained on successive AA oddity and BB identity (Urcuioli, 2008, Experiment 4). In other words, when tested on BA probe trials following training, they respond more to the comparisons on the reverse of the nonreinforced AB baseline trials than on the…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Experiments, Stimuli
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tanno, Takayuki; Silberberg, Alan; Sakagami, Takayuki – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats responded to one of two schedules that were, with equal probability, associated with a sample lever. One schedule was always variable ratio, while the other schedule, depending on the trial within a session, was: (a) a variable-interval schedule; (b) a tandem variable-interval,…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Experiments, Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pinkston, Jonathan W.; Lamb, R. J. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
When given to pigeons, the direct-acting dopamine agonist apomorphine elicits pecking. The response has been likened to foraging pecking because it bears remarkable similarity to foraging behavior, and it is enhanced by food deprivation. On the other hand, other data suggest the response is not related to foraging behavior and may even interfere…
Descriptors: Animals, Brain, Biochemistry, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mallpress, Dave E. W.; Fawcett, Tim W.; McNamara, John M.; Houston, Alasdair I. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
The relationship between positive and negative reinforcement and the symmetry of Thorndike's law of effect are unresolved issues in operant psychology. Here we show that, for a given pattern of responding on variable interval (VI) schedules with the same programmed rate of food rewards (positive reinforcement VI) or electric shocks (negative…
Descriptors: Animals, Stimuli, Rewards, Positive Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rickard, J. F.; Body, S.; Zhang, Z.; Bradshaw, C. M.; Szabadi, E. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2009
This experiment examined the relationship between reinforcer magnitude and quantitative measures of performance on progressive-ratio schedules. Fifteen rats were trained under a progressive-ratio schedule in seven phases of the experiment in which the volume of a 0.6-M sucrose solution reinforcer was varied within the range 6-300 microliters.…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Correlation, Reinforcement, Response Rates (Questionnaires)
Tanno, Takayuki; Silberberg, Alan; Sakagami, Takayuki – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2009
Food-deprived rats in Experiment 1 responded to one of two tandem schedules that were, with equal probability, associated with a sample lever. The tandem schedules' initial links were different random-interval schedules. Their values were adjusted to approximate equality in time to completing each tandem schedule's response requirements. The…
Descriptors: Intervals, Probability, Animals, Experiments
Pizzo, Matthew J.; Kirkpatrick, Kimberly; Blundell, Pamela J. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2009
The differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) schedule is commonly used to assess impulsivity, hyperactivity, and the cognitive effects of pharmacological treatments on performance. A DRL schedule requires subjects to wait a certain minimum amount of time between successive responses to receive reinforcement. The DRL criterion value, which…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Hyperactivity, Learning, Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shull, Richard L.; Grimes, Julie A.; Bennett, J. Adam – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2004
By nose poking a lighted key, rats obtained food pellets on either a variable- interval schedule of reinforcement or a schedule that required an average of four additional responses after the end of the variable-interval component (a tandem variable-interval variable-ratio 4 schedule). With both schedule types, the mean variable interval was…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Intervals, Time Management, Animals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shull, Richard L.; Grimes, Julie A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Rats obtained food-pellet reinforcers by nose poking a lighted key. Experiment 1 examined resistance to extinction following single-schedule training with different variable-interval schedules, ranging from a mean interval of 16 min to 0.25 min. That is, for each schedule, the rats received 20 consecutive daily baseline sessions and then a session…
Descriptors: Training, Positive Reinforcement, Intervals, Animals