Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Animals | 3 |
Experiments | 3 |
Intervals | 3 |
Predictor Variables | 3 |
Reaction Time | 3 |
Animal Behavior | 2 |
Reinforcement | 2 |
Stimuli | 2 |
Behavior Modification | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of the Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Grimes, Julie A. | 1 |
Sakagami, Takayuki | 1 |
Shull, Richard L. | 1 |
Silberberg, Alan | 1 |
Swisher, Melissa | 1 |
Tanno, Takayuki | 1 |
Urcuioli, Peter J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Urcuioli, Peter J.; Swisher, Melissa – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
Pigeons trained on successive AB symbolic matching show emergent BA antisymmetry if they are also trained on successive AA oddity and BB identity (Urcuioli, 2008, Experiment 4). In other words, when tested on BA probe trials following training, they respond more to the comparisons on the reverse of the nonreinforced AB baseline trials than on the…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Experiments, Stimuli
Tanno, Takayuki; Silberberg, Alan; Sakagami, Takayuki – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats responded to one of two schedules that were, with equal probability, associated with a sample lever. One schedule was always variable ratio, while the other schedule, depending on the trial within a session, was: (a) a variable-interval schedule; (b) a tandem variable-interval,…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Experiments, Reinforcement
Shull, Richard L.; Grimes, Julie A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Rats obtained food-pellet reinforcers by nose poking a lighted key. Experiment 1 examined resistance to extinction following single-schedule training with different variable-interval schedules, ranging from a mean interval of 16 min to 0.25 min. That is, for each schedule, the rats received 20 consecutive daily baseline sessions and then a session…
Descriptors: Training, Positive Reinforcement, Intervals, Animals