Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Color | 3 |
Selection | 3 |
Reinforcement | 2 |
Stimuli | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Animal Behavior | 1 |
Animals | 1 |
Classical Conditioning | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Conditioning | 1 |
Context Effect | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of the Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Arreola, Fara | 1 |
Brown, Glenn S. | 1 |
Corrado, Greg S. | 1 |
Martinez, Alma Gabriela | 1 |
Newsome, William T. | 1 |
Seung, H. Sebastian | 1 |
Sugrue, Leo P. | 1 |
Tonneau, Francois | 1 |
White, K. Geoffrey | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
White, K. Geoffrey; Brown, Glenn S. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011
Pigeons performed a delayed matching-to-sample task in which large or small reinforcers for correct remembering were signaled during the retention interval. Accuracy was low when small reinforcers were signaled, and high when large reinforcers were signaled (the signaled magnitude effect). When the reinforcer-size cue was switched from small to…
Descriptors: Animals, Reinforcement, Accuracy, Memory
Corrado, Greg S.; Sugrue, Leo P.; Seung, H. Sebastian; Newsome, William T. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
The equilibrium phenomenon of matching behavior traditionally has been studied in stationary environments. Here we attempt to uncover the local mechanism of choice that gives rise to matching by studying behavior in a highly dynamic foraging environment. In our experiments, 2 rhesus monkeys ("Macacca mulatta") foraged for juice rewards by making…
Descriptors: Models, Animal Behavior, Primatology, Selection
Tonneau, Francois; Arreola, Fara; Martinez, Alma Gabriela – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
In studies of function transformation, participants initially are taught to match stimuli in the presence of a contextual cue, X; the stimuli to be matched bear some formal relation to each other, for example, a relation of opposition or difference. In a second phase, the participants are taught to match arbitrary stimuli (say, A and B) in the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Cues, Objective Tests, Classical Conditioning