Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Auditory Stimuli | 3 |
| Language Acquisition | 3 |
| Linguistic Input | 3 |
| Syllables | 3 |
| Familiarity | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Indo European Languages | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Phonology | 2 |
| Task Analysis | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Learning and… | 3 |
Author
| Avrutin, Sergey | 1 |
| Davies, Benjamin | 1 |
| Demuth, Katherine | 1 |
| Levelt, Clara Cecilia | 1 |
| Radulescu, Silvia | 1 |
| Wijnen, Frank | 1 |
| Xu Rattanasone, Nan | 1 |
| ter Haar, Sita Minke | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDavies, Benjamin; Xu Rattanasone, Nan; Demuth, Katherine – Language Learning and Development, 2020
English-speaking children use plural morphology from around the age of 2, yet often omit the syllabic plural allomorph /-[schwa]z/ until age 5 (e.g., "bus(es)"). It is not clear if this protracted acquisition is due to articulatory difficulties, low input frequency, or fricative-final words (e.g., "bus," "nose") being…
Descriptors: Morphemes, Morphology (Languages), Linguistic Input, Phonology
Radulescu, Silvia; Wijnen, Frank; Avrutin, Sergey – Language Learning and Development, 2020
From limited evidence, children track the regularities of their language impressively fast and they infer generalized rules that apply to novel instances. This study investigated what drives the inductive leap from memorizing specific items and statistical regularities to extracting abstract rules. We propose an innovative entropy model that…
Descriptors: Linguistic Input, Language Acquisition, Grammar, Learning Processes
ter Haar, Sita Minke; Levelt, Clara Cecilia – Language Learning and Development, 2018
Infants are thought to be sensitive to frequency in the input as a cue for phonological development. However, linguistic biases such as phonological markedness have been argued to play a role too. Since frequency and markedness are correlated, the two assertions could be different interpretations of data that confound frequency and markedness. In…
Descriptors: Phonology, Teaching Methods, Preferences, Correlation
