Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Evaluators | 5 |
Interrater Reliability | 4 |
Language Tests | 3 |
Reliability | 3 |
Second Language Learning | 3 |
Writing Evaluation | 3 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
Rating Scales | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Language Testing | 6 |
Author
Huiying Cai | 1 |
John Pill | 1 |
Kuiken, Folkert | 1 |
Lin, Chih-Kai | 1 |
Peterson, Meghan E. | 1 |
Ping-Lin Chuang | 1 |
Rebecca Sickinger | 1 |
Tineke Brunfaut | 1 |
Vedder, Ineke | 1 |
Wind, Stefanie A. | 1 |
Xun Yan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Austria | 1 |
Illinois (Urbana) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ping-Lin Chuang – Language Testing, 2025
This experimental study explores how source use features impact raters' judgment of argumentation in a second language (L2) integrated writing test. One hundred four experienced and novice raters were recruited to complete a rating task that simulated the scoring assignment of a local English Placement Test (EPT). Sixty written responses were…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluators, Information Sources, Primary Sources
Huiying Cai; Xun Yan – Language Testing, 2024
Rater comments tend to be qualitatively analyzed to indicate raters' application of rating scales. This study applied natural language processing (NLP) techniques to quantify meaningful, behavioral information from a corpus of rater comments and triangulated that information with a many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) analysis of rater scores. The…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Item Response Theory, Rating Scales, Writing Evaluation
Rebecca Sickinger; Tineke Brunfaut; John Pill – Language Testing, 2025
Comparative Judgement (CJ) is an evaluation method, typically conducted online, whereby a rank order is constructed, and scores calculated, from judges' pairwise comparisons of performances. CJ has been researched in various educational contexts, though only rarely in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing settings, and is generally agreed to…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Lin, Chih-Kai – Language Testing, 2017
Sparse-rated data are common in operational performance-based language tests, as an inevitable result of assigning examinee responses to a fraction of available raters. The current study investigates the precision of two generalizability-theory methods (i.e., the rating method and the subdividing method) specifically designed to accommodate the…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Language Tests, Generalizability Theory, Accuracy
Wind, Stefanie A.; Peterson, Meghan E. – Language Testing, 2018
The use of assessments that require rater judgment (i.e., rater-mediated assessments) has become increasingly popular in high-stakes language assessments worldwide. Using a systematic literature review, the purpose of this study is to identify and explore the dominant methods for evaluating rating quality within the context of research on…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Interrater Reliability
Kuiken, Folkert; Vedder, Ineke – Language Testing, 2017
The importance of functional adequacy as an essential component of L2 proficiency has been observed by several authors (Pallotti, 2009; De Jong, Steinel, Florijn, Schoonen, & Hulstijn, 2012a, b). The rationale underlying the present study is that the assessment of writing proficiency in L2 is not fully possible without taking into account the…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Rating Scales, Computational Linguistics, Persuasive Discourse