Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Testing | 2 |
Author
| Haug, Tobias | 1 |
| Raatz, Ulrich | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Haug, Tobias – Language Testing, 2012
Despite the current need for reliable and valid test instruments in different countries in order to monitor the sign language acquisition of deaf children, very few tests are commercially available that offer strong evidence for their psychometric properties. This mirrors the current state of affairs for many sign languages, where very little…
Descriptors: Evidence, Sign Language, Language Tests, Construct Validity
Peer reviewedRaatz, Ulrich – Language Testing, 1985
Argues that classical test theory cannot be used at the item level on "authentic" language tests. However, if the total score is derived by adding the scores of a number of different and independent parts, test reliability can be estimated. Suggests using the Classical Latent Additives model to examine test-part homogeneity. (Author/SED)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory, Models, Second Language Learning

Direct link
