NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deygers, Bart; Van den Branden, Kris; Van Gorp, Koen – Language Testing, 2018
University entrance language tests are often administered under the assumption that even if language proficiency does not determine academic success, a certain proficiency level is still required. Nevertheless, little research has focused on how well L2 students cope with the linguistic demands of their studies in the first months after passing an…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Entrance Examinations, Language Tests, Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hoekje, Barbara – Language Testing, 2016
This commentary argues that the OET research raises inescapable contradictions in trying to separate "language" from "communication" within a weak performance test and advocates for reconceptualizing the legitimate domain of "language" more widely, reclaiming the full potential of the communicative competence…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Languages for Special Purposes, Second Language Learning, Communicative Competence (Languages)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Macqueen, Susy; Pill, John; Knoch, Ute – Language Testing, 2016
Objects that sit between intersecting social worlds, such as Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) tests, are "boundary objects"--dynamic, historically derived mechanisms which maintain coherence between worlds (Star & Griesemer, 1989). They emerge initially from sociopolitical mandates, such as the need to ensure a safe and efficient…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Health Personnel, Languages for Special Purposes, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
O'Hagan, Sally; Pill, John; Zhang, Ying – Language Testing, 2016
Criticism of specific-purpose language (LSP) tests is often directed at their limited ability to represent fully the demands of the target language use situation. Such criticisms extend to the criteria used to assess test performance, which may fail to capture what matters to participants in the domain of interest. This paper reports on the…
Descriptors: Health Personnel, Language Tests, English for Special Purposes, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Krekeler, Christian – Language Testing, 2006
This study investigates the effect of background knowledge in languages for specific academic purposes (LSAP) tests. Following the observation of previous studies that the effect of background knowledge varies according to the level of language proficiency, the study applied the theory of linguistic thresholds to LSAP reading tests. The research…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Reading Tests, Language Proficiency, Prior Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Douglas, Dan – Language Testing, 2001
Discusses criteria used in assessing language for specific purposes tests. Examines the issue of separability of language and content and reinforces points made by Jacoby and McNamara (1999) that second language assessments based entirely on linguistic criteria may fail to satisfy the purpose of the test user, whereas the use of indigenous…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Language Tests, Languages for Special Purposes, Native Speakers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wu, Weiping M.; Stansfield, Charles W. – Language Testing, 2001
Describes a working model used to determine the target language use in a language for specific purpose test project: the Listening Summary Translation Exam in Taiwanese (LSTE/T). The purpose of the LSTE/T was to evaluate the summary translation ability of applicants who want to work as linguists in law enforcement agencies in the United States.…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Language Usage, Languages for Special Purposes, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cumming, Alister – Language Testing, 2001
Interviewed teachers from around the world to examine a specific purpose (SP) versus general purpose (GP) distinction in their orientations to the work they do. The difference in orientation was signaled in the criteria the teachers use to assess students' writing. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Interviews, Language Teachers, Language Tests