Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Progress Monitoring | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Learning Disabilities | 1 |
| Oral Reading | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning Disabilities… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkParker, David C.; Van Norman, Ethan; Nelson, Peter M. – Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2018
The accuracy of decision rules for progress monitoring data is influenced by multiple factors. This study examined the accuracy of decision rule recommendations with over 4,500 second-and third-grade students receiving a tier II reading intervention program. The sensitivity and specificity of three decision rule recommendations for predicting…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Accuracy, Grade 2, Grade 3
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Parker, David C. – Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2016
Educators use curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (CBM-R) to measure student response to instruction. Current decision-making frameworks assume students demonstrate linear growth across a school year. However, growth appears nonlinear for at least a subgroup of students. We assessed the degree to which grade two (n = 800) and grade three…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Oral Reading, Progress Monitoring, Grade 2
