NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)3
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Source
Learning Disability Quarterly20
Location
Israel1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daley, Samantha G.; Rappolt-Schlichtmann, Gabrielle – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2018
Being identified with a learning disability makes students vulnerable to experiences of stigmatization, which can be associated with negative academic and emotional effects. Yet, research with other vulnerable populations demonstrates that individual perceptions of stigmatization, or stigma consciousness, are not uniform and that variability in…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Social Bias, Social Attitudes, Self Concept
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mercer, Sterett H.; Keller-Margulis, Milena A.; Faith, Erin L.; Reid, Erin K.; Ochs, Sarah – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2019
Written-expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is used for screening and progress monitoring students with or at risk of learning disabilities (LD) for academic supports; however, WE-CBM has limitations in technical adequacy, construct representation, and scoring feasibility as grade-level increases. The purpose of this study was to…
Descriptors: Grade 2, Grade 3, Grade 4, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McGill, Ryan J.; Styck, Kara M.; Palomares, Ronald S.; Hass, Michael R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2016
As a result of the upcoming Federal reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), practitioners and researchers have begun vigorously debating what constitutes evidence-based assessment for the identification of specific learning disability (SLD). This debate has resulted in strong support for a method that…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Disabilities, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lufi, Dubi; Awwad, Abeer – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2013
The purpose of this article was to describe an initial step developing a new scale to identify individuals with learning disabilities (LD) and test anxiety. Eighty-eight students answered the "Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2" (MMPI-2). The participants were drawn from the following three groups: (a) adults with LD and test…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Test Anxiety, Comparative Analysis, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavale, Kenneth A.; Forness, Steven R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1984
Meta-analysis was used to arrive at a quantitative synthesis of the results of 94 studies of the validity of Wechsler regroupings for differential diagnosis of learning disabilities. The primary findings indicated that no recategorization, profile, factor cluster, or pattern showed a significant difference between learning disabled and normal…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
The validity of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery was evaluated with a sample of 50 learning disabled fourth graders. In general, the Battery has some convergent validity but little discriminant validity relative to various cluster scores or specific uses. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Intermediate Grades, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slate, John R.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1990
Scores of 38 learning-disabled college students on the revised Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-R) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) were compared. Results indicated significant correlations between the tests, though subjects tended to obtain higher scores on the WISC-R than on the WAIS-R. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewis, Richard D.; Lorion, Raymond P. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1988
Evaluation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery's utility in distinguishing between 30 male adolescents diagnosed as learning disabled (LD) and 30 matched non-LD students indicated that the battery correctly classified 90 percent of the sample with 6.7 percent false positives and 13.3 percent false negatives. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reeve, Ronald E.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979
The study compared the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Tests of Cognitive Ability and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised for a sample of 51 learning disabled children (7-11 years old). (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beech, Martha C. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
Findings were interpreted to mean that the BTBC can be used as a general estimate of cognitive ability. Canonical analysis of all variables revealed the presence of one common factor, language comprehension (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Concept Formation, Exceptional Child Research, Kindergarten
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGue, Matt; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1982
The usefulness of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery (W-J) to assess learning disabled (LD) children was assessed. The W-J factor clusters could not be replicated with this LD sample, and little evidence was found of the validity of either the cognitive factor clusters or the aptitude factor clusters. (Author/SEW)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Tests, Factor Structure, Interest Inventories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Larry P.; Wolf, Steven R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979
The article focuses on the controversy over norm-referenced v criterion-referenced measures (CRM) in assessment of learning disorders. The authors contend that while the reliability of CRMs is generally indisputable, the validity of measures designed from local curricula is still dependent on the intuitive judgments of teachers. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Inglis, James; Lawson, J. S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1987
Reanalysis of data derived from a meta-analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, using a learning disability index derived from a principal-components analysis, found that the test discriminated reliably between 9,372 learning-disabled children and their non-disabled peers. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Children, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blaha, John; Vance, Hubert – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979
Among the findings was that the factor structure of learning disabled children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised was somewhat more fractionated and complex than for normals, but not as complex as for reading disabled children. (Author/DLS)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glutting, Joseph J.; Bear, George G. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1989
The study evaluated the utility of Kaufman-Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) subtests in differentiating learning-disabled children from students with other handicapping conditions, and compared K-ABC subtests with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised subtests. Results showed that subtest scores did not enhance differential…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2