Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Associative Learning | 4 |
| Models | 4 |
| Cues | 3 |
| Learning Processes | 3 |
| Competition | 2 |
| Stimuli | 2 |
| Animals | 1 |
| Attribution Theory | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Color | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Motivation | 4 |
Author
| Beckers, Tom | 1 |
| Hamilton, Derek A. | 1 |
| Matute, Helena | 1 |
| Orgaz, Cristina | 1 |
| Redhead, Edward S. | 1 |
| Vadillo, Miguel A. | 1 |
| Vandorpe, Stefaan | 1 |
| Ward-Robinson, Jasper | 1 |
| de Houwer, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVadillo, Miguel A.; Orgaz, Cristina; Matute, Helena – Learning and Motivation, 2008
The present series of experiments explores the interaction between retroactive interference and cue competition in human contingency learning. The results of two experiments show that a cue that has been exposed to a cue competition treatment (overshadowing) loses part of its ability to retroactively interfere with responding to a different cue…
Descriptors: Cues, Competition, Interaction, Cognitive Development
Redhead, Edward S.; Hamilton, Derek A. – Learning and Motivation, 2009
Three computer based experiments, testing human participants in a non-immersive virtual watermaze task, used a blocking design to assess whether two sets of geometric cues would compete in a manner described by associative models of learning. In stage 1, participants were required to discriminate between visually distinct platforms. In stage 2,…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Cues, Learning Strategies
Vandorpe, Stefaan; de Houwer, Jan; Beckers, Tom – Learning and Motivation, 2007
Revisions of common associative learning models incorporate a within-compound association mechanism in order to explain retrospective cue competition effects (e.g., [Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B", pp.…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Memory, Inferences, Competition
Ward-Robinson, Jasper – Learning and Motivation, 2004
Three mechanisms can explain second-order conditioning: (1) The second-order conditioned stimulus (CS2) could activate a representation of the first-order conditioned stimulus (CS1), thereby provoking the conditioned response (CR); The CS2 could enter into an excitatory association with either (2) the representation governing the CR, or (3) with a…
Descriptors: Conditioning, Stimuli, Reinforcement, Animals
