Descriptor
| Bibliographic Databases | 2 |
| Information Retrieval | 2 |
| Literature Reviews | 2 |
| Abstracting | 1 |
| Abstracts | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Electronic Text | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Metadata | 1 |
| Natural Language Processing | 1 |
| Quality Control | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Library Trends | 2 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPinto, Maria; Lancaster, F. W. – Library Trends, 1999
Presents various levels of criteria for judging the quality of abstracts and abstracting. Requirements for abstracts to be read by humans are compared with requirements for those to be searched by computer. Concludes that the wide availability of complete text in electronic form does not reduce the value of abstracts for information retrieval.…
Descriptors: Abstracting, Abstracts, Bibliographic Databases, Electronic Text
Peer reviewedChowdhury, Gobinda G. – Library Trends, 1999
Reviews template mining research and shows how templates are used in World Wide Web search engines and metasearch engines for helping end-users generate natural language search expressions. Potential areas of application of template mining for extraction of information from digital documents are highlighted, and how such applications are used is…
Descriptors: Bibliographic Databases, Content Analysis, Information Retrieval, Literature Reviews
