Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Test Items | 4 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
Methods | 2 |
Psychometrics | 2 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
Depression (Psychology) | 1 |
Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Measurement:… | 4 |
Author
Bao, Yu | 1 |
Bradshaw, Laine | 1 |
Cappaert, Kevin J. | 1 |
Carstensen, Claus H. | 1 |
Chang, Yu-Feng | 1 |
Frey, Andreas | 1 |
Michael Bass | 1 |
Scott Morris | 1 |
Sheng Zhang | 1 |
Wen, Yao | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
New York (Rochester) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Michael Bass; Scott Morris; Sheng Zhang – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2025
Administration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), using multidimensional computer adaptive tests (MCATs) has the potential to reduce patient burden, but the efficiency of MCAT depends on the degree to which an individual's responses fit the psychometric properties of the assessment. Assessing patients' symptom burden through the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Patients, Outcome Measures
Cappaert, Kevin J.; Wen, Yao; Chang, Yu-Feng – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
Events such as curriculum changes or practice effects can lead to item parameter drift (IPD) in computer adaptive testing (CAT). The current investigation introduced a point- and weight-adjusted D[superscript 2] method for IPD detection for use in a CAT environment when items are suspected of drifting across test administrations. Type I error and…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Identification
Bao, Yu; Bradshaw, Laine – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) can provide multidimensional diagnostic feedback about students' mastery levels of knowledge components or attributes. One advantage of using DCMs is the ability to accurately and reliably classify students into mastery levels with a relatively small number of items per attribute. Combining DCMs with…
Descriptors: Test Items, Selection, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Frey, Andreas; Carstensen, Claus H. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2009
On a general level, the objective of diagnostic classifications models (DCMs) lies in a classification of individuals regarding multiple latent skills. In this article, the authors show that this objective can be achieved by multidimensional adaptive testing (MAT) as well. The authors discuss whether or not the restricted applicability of DCMs can…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Classification, Psychometrics