Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Coping | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| German | 1 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 1 |
| Intimacy | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement and Evaluation in… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dyadic Adjustment Scale | 2 |
| Marlowe Crowne Social… | 1 |
| Multidimensional… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLevesque, Christine; Lafontaine, Marie-France; Caron, Angela; Fitzpatrick, Josée – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014
The purpose of this study was to validate the English version of the original German Dyadic Coping Inventory. Results indicated that the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory is a valid and reliable measure of dyadic coping in a sample of 709 heterosexual university students.
Descriptors: Validity, College Students, Coping, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedMatte, Melody; Lafontaine, Marie-France – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2012
The objective of the present study was to provide validity evidence for the scores from the Romantic Relationship Perfectionism Scale. Results indicate a two-factor structure, adequate reliability, and overall good convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and incremental validity evidence. The strengths and limitations of this measure are discussed.…
Descriptors: Validity, Reliability, Factor Structure, Psychometrics
