NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Bruce; Borrello, Gloria M. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1986
Factor adequacy and other results based on data from college students (N=359) provided positive evidence regarding the construct validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Second order factor analysis supported the appropriateness of the MBTI item weighting procedures. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: College Students, Factor Structure, Higher Education, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, William L.; Mauzey, Edward; Johnson, Annabel M.; Murphy, Stanley D.; Zimmerman, Kurt J. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2001
Examines the higher order structure of Form G of the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. A third order component analysis of a sample (N=926) found two higher order components. This higher order analysis contributes to the research literature pertaining to the generalized structure of the personality measure. (Contains 44 references and 1 table.) (GCP)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carey, John C.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1989
Examined relationships between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) scales and established measures of field dependence-independence and cognitive complexity using female college students (N=79). Found subscales correlated significantly with measures of field dependence-independence but not with measure of cognitive complexity. Found MBTI measured…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, College Students, Females, Field Dependence Independence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cummings, William H., III – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1995
Reports results of analyses of key tables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Atlas of Type Tables. Significant age group effects on every dimension indicates the need to reestimate population norms for each continuum on the MBTI for interpreting scores of people of various ages. (LKS)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Effect Size, Extraversion Introversion, Individual Development