NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Matteo Bugatti; Yixiao Dong; Jesse Owen; Zachary Richardson; Wendy Rasmussen; Douglas Newton – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2024
Measurement-based care, an evidence-based practice endorsed by the American Psychological Association, is underpinned by routine assessment supporting a data-driven approach to clinical decision making. Nonetheless, there is a need for brief, nonproprietary measures assessing non-symptom-based outcomes. The present study examined the psychometric…
Descriptors: Psychotherapy, Psychometrics, Outcomes of Treatment, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Blanchard, Brittany E.; Mata-Greve, Felicia; Johnson, Morgan; Fortney, John C. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2023
This study developed and psychometrically evaluated a brief measure of mental health treatment knowledge (N = 726). Scores from "Knowledge about Treatment" (KaT) demonstrated a unidimensional measure with good model fit, internal consistency reliability, convergent and predictive validity, test-retest reliability, and measurement…
Descriptors: Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Mental Health Programs, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jimenez-Arista, Laura E.; Holzapfel, Jennifer; Shanholtz, Caroline E.; Tracey, Terence J. G. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2020
We examined the validity of the Shorter Psychotherapy and Counseling Evaluation (Halstead, Leach, & Rust, 2007). Results supported incremental predictive validity (up to 12%) over the Outcome Questionnaire--10.2 (OQ-10.2), predictive validity with the Outcome Questionnaire--45 and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems--32, and convergent…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Treatment, Psychotherapy, Measures (Individuals), Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Seong-Hyeon; Beretvas, S. Natasha; Sherry, Alissa R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2010
This study investigated the Outcome Questionnaire's (OQ-45) factor structure and demonstrated the use of factor mixture modeling (FMM) for the purpose of score validation. OQ-45 scores did not fit the one-class, one- and three-factor models. Use of FMM to identify a two-class model is detailed. Implications for OQ-45 users are provided. (Contains…
Descriptors: Validity, Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glaser, Brian A.; Campbell, Linda F.; Calhoun, Georgia B.; Bates, Jeffrey M.; Petrocelli, John V. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2002
N.B. Schmidt, T.E. Joiner, J.E. Young, and M.J. Telch (1995) provided preliminary construct validity for scores from J.E. Young's (1990) 205-item Early Maladaptive Schema Questionnaire. The present study extends this work by examining the construct validity of scores from the shorter 75-item version of this instrument-the Early Maladaptive Schema…
Descriptors: Cognitive Restructuring, Construct Validity, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Worthington, Roger L.; Dillon, Frank R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2003
This study supported evidence of reliability and validity of the Theoretical Orientation Profile Scale-Revised (TOPS-R) scores. The TOPS-R was designed to measure theoretical orientation among counselors and trainees. Factor analysis yielded a 6-factor solution accounting for 87.5% of the total variance in the scale. The 6 factors corresponded to…
Descriptors: Counselor Characteristics, Counselor Training, Counselors, Factor Analysis