NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lenz, A. Stephen; Ault, Haley; Balkin, Richard S.; Barrio Minton, Casey; Erford, Bradley T.; Hays, Danica G.; Kim, Bryan S. K.; Li, Chi – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2022
In April 2021, The Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling Executive Council commissioned a time-referenced task group to revise the Responsibilities of Users of Standardized Tests (RUST) Statement (3rd edition) published by the Association for Assessment in Counseling (AAC) in 2003. The task group developed a work plan to implement…
Descriptors: Responsibility, Standardized Tests, Counselor Training, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Balkin, Richard S. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2013
Factor structure for the Goal Attainment Scale of Stabilization was evaluated using separate samples for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated a 25-item two-factor solution. The Goal Attainment Scale of Stabilization may be useful in identifying the extent to which adolescents in crisis meet therapeutic…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Test Validity, Factor Analysis, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sussman, Joshua; Beaujean, A. Alexander; Worrell, Frank C.; Watson, Stevie – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2013
Item response models (IRMs) were used to analyze Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) scores. Rasch analysis scores were compared with classical test theory (CTT) scores. The partial credit model demonstrated a high goodness of fit and correlations between Rasch and CTT scores ranged from 0.91 to 0.99. CRIS scores are supported by both methods.…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Theory, Measures (Individuals), Racial Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pearson, Judith E.; Long, Thomas J. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1985
Reports the test-retest reliabilities for the Schedule of Recent Experiences (item counts) and the Recent Life Changes Questionnaire and compares the two scales. Subjects (N=109) were men and women enlisted in the US military reserves. Results indicated the two questionnaires demonstrate acceptable test-retest reliability. (BH)
Descriptors: Military Personnel, Scoring, Test Reliability