Descriptor
Source
| Multivariate Behavioral… | 5 |
Author
| Blommers, Paul J. | 1 |
| Charlin, Ventura | 1 |
| Cliff, Norman | 1 |
| Fava, Joseph L. | 1 |
| Hall, Charles E. | 1 |
| Harris, Richard J. | 1 |
| Huberty, Carl J. | 1 |
| Velicer, Wayne F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHall, Charles E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, History
Peer reviewedVelicer, Wayne F.; Fava, Joseph L. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1987
Principal component analysis, image component analysis, and maximum likelihood factor analysis were compared to assess the effects of variable sampling. Results with respect to degree of saturation and average number of variables per factor were clear and dramatic. Differential effects on boundary cases and nonconvergence problems were also found.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models, Matrices
The Invalidity of Partitioned-U Tests in Canonical Correlation and Multivariate Analysis of Variance
Peer reviewedHarris, Richard J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976
The partitioned-U procedure is outlined, a fundamental logical flaw in this procedure's avoidance of any direct test of the significance of the first discriminant function or largest coefficient of canonical correlation is pointed out, and two alternatives to the partitioned-U procedure are discussed. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Correlation, Hypothesis Testing, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedHuberty, Carl J.; Blommers, Paul J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Classification, Discriminant Analysis
Peer reviewedCliff, Norman; Charlin, Ventura – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1991
Variance formulas of H. E. Daniels and M. G. Kendall (1947) are generalized to allow for the presence of ties and variance of the sample tau correlation. Applications of these generalized formulas are discussed and illustrated using data from a 1965 study of contraceptive use in 15 developing countries. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Contraception, Developing Nations
