NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano; Timmerman, Marieke E.; Kiers, Henk A. L. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
A common problem in exploratory factor analysis is how many factors need to be extracted from a particular data set. We propose a new method for selecting the number of major common factors: the Hull method, which aims to find a model with an optimal balance between model fit and number of parameters. We examine the performance of the method in an…
Descriptors: Simulation, Research Methodology, Factor Analysis, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Conijn, Judith M.; Emons, Wilco H. M.; van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.; Sijtsma, Klaas – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
The logistic person response function (PRF) models the probability of a correct response as a function of the item locations. Reise (2000) proposed to use the slope parameter of the logistic PRF as a person-fit measure. He reformulated the logistic PRF model as a multilevel logistic regression model and estimated the PRF parameters from this…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Patients, Probability, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Cai, Li – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
The likelihood ratio test statistic G[squared](dif) is widely used for comparing the fit of nested models in categorical data analysis. In large samples, this statistic is distributed as a chi-square with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in degrees of freedom between the tested models, but only if the least restrictive model is correctly…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Data Analysis, Simulation, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, A. Ralph; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
Issues related to the decision of the number of factors to retain in factor analyses are identified. Three widely used decision rules--the Kaiser-Guttman (eigenvalue greater than one), scree, and likelihood ratio tests--are investigated using simulated data. Recommendations for use are made. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Data Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zwick, William R. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
The performance of four rules for determining the number of components (factors) to retain (Kaiser's eigenvalue greater than one, Cattell's scree, Bartlett's test, and Velicer's Map) was investigated across four systematically varied factors (sample size, number of variables, number of components, and component saturation). (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Data Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Everett, J. E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1983
An approach to determining the number of factors to be retained from a factor analysis using split-half factor comparabilities is presented. The use of this approach in determining proper factor rotation is also discussed. (JKS)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Oblique Rotation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rindskopf, David M.; Strauss, Shiela M.; Falkin, Gregory P.; Deren, Sherry – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003
This article examines whether relationships between individual characteristics and HIV status can be identified when self-report data are used as a proxy for HIV serotest results. The analyses use data obtained from HIV serotests and face-to-face interviews with 7,256 out-of-treatment drug users in ten sites from 1992 to 1998. Relationships…
Descriptors: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Individual Characteristics, Measurement Techniques, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Velicer, Wayne F.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
Factor analysis, image analysis, and principal component analysis are compared with respect to the factor patterns they would produce under various conditions. The general conclusion that is reached is that the three methods produce results that are equivalent. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit