NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Castro-Schilo, Laura; Ferrer, Emilio – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2013
We illustrate the idiographic/nomothetic debate by comparing 3 approaches to using daily self-report data on affect for predicting relationship quality and breakup. The 3 approaches included (a) the first day in the series of daily data; (b) the mean and variability of the daily series; and (c) parameters from dynamic factor analysis, a…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Prediction, Group Behavior, Collectivism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alessandri, Guido; Vecchione, Michele; Tisak, John; Barbaranelli, Claudio – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
When a self-report instrument includes a balanced number of positively and negatively worded items, factor analysts often use method factors to aid model fitting. The nature of these factors, often referred to as acquiescence, is still debated. Relying upon previous results (Alessandri et al., 2010; DiStefano & Motl, 2006, 2008; Rauch, Schweizer,…
Descriptors: Evidence, Construct Validity, Validity, Personality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Chun-Ting; Zhang, Guangjian; Edwards, Michael C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is often conducted with ordinal data (e.g., items with 5-point responses) in the social and behavioral sciences. These ordinal variables are often treated as if they were continuous in practice. An alternative strategy is to assume that a normally distributed continuous variable underlies each ordinal variable.…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano; Timmerman, Marieke E.; Kiers, Henk A. L. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
A common problem in exploratory factor analysis is how many factors need to be extracted from a particular data set. We propose a new method for selecting the number of major common factors: the Hull method, which aims to find a model with an optimal balance between model fit and number of parameters. We examine the performance of the method in an…
Descriptors: Simulation, Research Methodology, Factor Analysis, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhong, Xiaoling; Yuan, Ke-Hai – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
In the structural equation modeling literature, the normal-distribution-based maximum likelihood (ML) method is most widely used, partly because the resulting estimator is claimed to be asymptotically unbiased and most efficient. However, this may not hold when data deviate from normal distribution. Outlying cases or nonnormally distributed data,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Racial Identification, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Winter, J. C. F.; Dodou, D.; Wieringa, P. A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is generally regarded as a technique for large sample sizes ("N"), with N = 50 as a reasonable absolute minimum. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions in which EFA can yield good quality results for "N" below 50. Simulations were carried out to estimate the minimum required "N" for different…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Analysis, Enrollment, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Snyder, Conrad W., Jr. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976
Examines intrinsic individual differences in conceptual behavior with a multivariate model, three mode factor analysis. The analyses yielded five individual difference performance factors, three stage factors, and four response components indicating the importance of a multivariate representation of complex behavior. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, College Students, Concept Formation, Factor Analysis