NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cliff, Norman; Caruso, John C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1998
Examines the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised across nine age groups using several methods of factor analysis, including reliable component analysis (RCA). Factor structure is discussed, and the usefulness of the RCA method is demonstrated. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guilford, J. P. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1981
Data obtained from previously published reports of factor analyses concerning aptitudes were re-analyzed using Guilford's structure of intellect model as a theoretical basis for the re-analysis. Results provide support for the model and for its oblique nature. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Factor Analysis, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Undheim, Johan Olav; Gustafsson, Jan-Eric – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1987
The hypothesis that fluid intelligence is equivalent to the factor of general intelligence is investigated using LISREL to specify higher-order models in reanalyses of three sets of psychometric data from subjects 11, 13, and 15 years old. The three studies showed fluid intelligence to be equivalent with a general factor. (LMO)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Elementary Secondary Education, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roskam, Edward E.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1992
First- and second-round commentaries on an article by L. Guttman are presented. The following authors responded, with two articles each: (1) E. E. Roskam and J. Ellis; (2) P. H. Schonemann; (3) A. R. Jensen; (4) J. C. Loehlin; and (5) J.-E. Gustafsson. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Groups, Intelligence, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guttman, Louis – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1992
Argues that Jensen's article contains an inaccurate and misleading account of Spearman's work and distorts the basic concepts of factor analysis. The target article has failed in all its main objectives; its major failing is a result of the irrelevance of factor analysis to the study of group differences. (SLD)
Descriptors: Blacks, Equations (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Groups