NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schneeweiss, Hans – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1997
A sufficient condition in terms of the unique variances of a common factor model is given for the results of factor analysis to come closer to those of principal components analysis. In general, vectors corresponding to loading matrices can be related to each other by a specific measure of closeness, which is illustrated. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trendafilov, Nickolay T. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1996
An iterative process is proposed for obtaining an orthogonal simple structure solution. At each iteration, a target matrix is constructed such that the relative contributions of the target majorize the original ones, factor by factor. The convergence of the procedure is proven, and the algorithm is illustrated. (SLD)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ten Berge, Jos M. F. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1996
H. F. Kaiser, S. Hunka, and J. Bianchini have presented a method (1971) to compare two matrices of factor loadings based on the same variables, but different groups of individuals. The optimal rotation involved is examined from a mathematical point of view, and the method is shown to be invalid. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Structure, Groups, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Factor structures of student ratings of instruction resulting from total group, between group, and within group analyses were compared. Six factors obtained from responses by students to 31 items were used to approximate the between group covariance matrix based on 437 classroom means and the pooled within classroom covariance matrix. (Author/BJG)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trendafilov, Nickolay T. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1994
An alternative to the PROMAX exploratory method is presented for constructing a target matrix in Procrustean rotation in factor analysis. A technique is proposed based on vector majorization. The approach is illustrated with several standard numerical examples. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Golding, Stephen L.; Seidman, Edward – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974
A relatively simple technique for assessing the convergence of sets of variables across method domains is presented. The technique, two-step principal components analysis, empirically orthogonalizes each method domain into sets of components, and then analyzes convergence among components across domains. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dunlap, William P.; Cornwell, John M. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1994
The fundamental problems that ipsative measures impose for factor analysis are shown analytically. Normative and ipsative correlation matrices are used to show that the factor pattern induced by ipsativity will overwhelm any factor structure seen with normative factor analysis, making factor analysis not interpretable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cattell, Raymond B.; Burdsal, Charles A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Descriptors: Cluster Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, A. Ralph – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Collins, Linda M.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1986
The present study compares the performance of phi coefficients and tetrachorics along two dimensions of factor recovery in binary data. These dimensions are (1) accuracy of nontrivial factor identifications; and (2) factor structure recovery given a priori knowledge of the correct number of factors to rotate. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Item Analysis