NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Preacher, Kristopher J.; Zhang, Guangjian; Kim, Cheongtag; Mels, Gerhard – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2013
A central problem in the application of exploratory factor analysis is deciding how many factors to retain ("m"). Although this is inherently a model selection problem, a model selection perspective is rarely adopted for this task. We suggest that Cudeck and Henly's (1991) framework can be applied to guide the selection process.…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Selection, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Libo; Hser, Yih-Ing – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
In this article, we directly question the common practice in growth mixture model (GMM) applications that exclusively rely on the fitting model without covariates for GMM class enumeration. We provide theoretical and simulation evidence to demonstrate that exclusion of covariates from GMM class enumeration could be problematic in many cases. Based…
Descriptors: Evidence, Risk, Goodness of Fit, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Brown, Anna – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010
The comparative format used in ranking and paired comparisons tasks can significantly reduce the impact of uniform response biases typically associated with rating scales. Thurstone's (1927, 1931) model provides a powerful framework for modeling comparative data such as paired comparisons and rankings. Although Thurstonian models are generally…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Rating Scales, Models, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Conijn, Judith M.; Emons, Wilco H. M.; van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.; Sijtsma, Klaas – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
The logistic person response function (PRF) models the probability of a correct response as a function of the item locations. Reise (2000) proposed to use the slope parameter of the logistic PRF as a person-fit measure. He reformulated the logistic PRF model as a multilevel logistic regression model and estimated the PRF parameters from this…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Patients, Probability, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cai, Li; Lee, Taehun – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
We apply the Supplemented EM algorithm (Meng & Rubin, 1991) to address a chronic problem with the "two-stage" fitting of covariance structure models in the presence of ignorable missing data: the lack of an asymptotically chi-square distributed goodness-of-fit statistic. We show that the Supplemented EM algorithm provides a…
Descriptors: Aggression, Simulation, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ferron, John; Dailey, Ron; Yi, Qing – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2002
Used computer simulation methods to examine the sensitivity of model fit criteria to misspecification of the first-level error structure in two-level models of change and to examine the impact of misspecification estimates on the variance parameters, estimates of the fixed effects, and tests of the fixed effects. Discusses problems caused by…
Descriptors: Change, Computer Simulation, Goodness of Fit, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Joreskog, Karl G.; Moustaki, Irini – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001
Describes four approaches to factor analysis of ordinal variables that take proper account of ordinality and compared three of these approaches with respect to parameter estimates and fit using generated data and an empirical data set. Focuses on how to test the model and how to measure model fit. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Zhiyong; Nesselroade, John R. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
Dynamic factor models have been used to analyze continuous time series behavioral data. We extend 2 main dynamic factor model variations--the direct autoregressive factor score (DAFS) model and the white noise factor score (WNFS) model--to categorical DAFS and WNFS models in the framework of the underlying variable method and illustrate them with…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Computation, Simulation, Behavioral Science Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacCallum, Robert C.; Widaman, Keith F.; Preacher, Kristopher J.; Hong, Sehee – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001
Examined the effects of sample size and other design features on correspondence between factors obtained from analysis of sample data and those present in the population from which the samples were drawn, examining these phenomena in the situation in which the common factor model does not hold exactly in the population. Tested a theoretical…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lubke, Gitta; Neale, Michael C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
Latent variable models exist with continuous, categorical, or both types of latent variables. The role of latent variables is to account for systematic patterns in the observed responses. This article has two goals: (a) to establish whether, based on observed responses, it can be decided that an underlying latent variable is continuous or…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Models, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rogers, William M.; Schmitt, Neal – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004
Manifest variables in covariance structure analysis are often combined to form parcels for use as indicators in a measurement model. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate four empirical algorithms for creating such parcels, focusing on the effects of dimensionality on accuracy of parameter estimation and model fit. Results suggest that…
Descriptors: Mathematics, Meta Analysis, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Hernandez, Adolfo; McDonald, Roderick P. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
We introduce a multidimensional item response theory (IRT) model for binary data based on a proximity response mechanism. Under the model, a respondent at the mode of the item response function (IRF) endorses the item with probability one. The mode of the IRF is the ideal point, or in the multidimensional case, an ideal hyperplane. The model…
Descriptors: Scoring, Probability, Goodness of Fit, Life Satisfaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferrando, Pere J.; Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
This article describes a model for response times that is proposed as a supplement to the usual factor-analytic model for responses to graded or more continuous typical-response items. The use of the proposed model together with the factor model provides additional information about the respondent and can potentially increase the accuracy of the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Item Response Theory, Computation, Likert Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Thomas J.; Sutrick, Kenneth H. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1988
Cognitive Differentiation Analysis (CDA) represents a method to measure the correspondence of an individual vector or a composite vector of descriptor ratings to a matrix of pair-wise dissimilarity judgments where both sets of judgments are assumed to be ordinal. The zero intercept regression extension of CDA is described. (TJH)
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Equations (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McDonald, Roderick P.; Mok, Magdalena M.-C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1995
It is shown that goodness-of-fit criteria developed for the evaluation of multivariate structural models can be applied to assist in evaluating the dimensionality of a test consisting of binary items, and correlative methods regularly used in factor analysis can be employed to diagnose causes of misfit. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2