Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Multivariate Analysis | 3 |
| Probability | 3 |
| Sampling | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Multivariate Behavioral… | 3 |
Author
| Brannick, Michael T. | 1 |
| Cafri, Guy | 1 |
| Everitt, B. S. | 1 |
| Kromrey, Jeffrey D. | 1 |
| Thoemmes, Felix J. | 1 |
| West, Stephen G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thoemmes, Felix J.; West, Stephen G. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
In this article we propose several modeling choices to extend propensity score analysis to clustered data. We describe different possible model specifications for estimation of the propensity score: single-level model, fixed effects model, and two random effects models. We also consider both conditioning within clusters and conditioning across…
Descriptors: Probability, Scores, Statistical Analysis, Models
Cafri, Guy; Kromrey, Jeffrey D.; Brannick, Michael T. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010
This article uses meta-analyses published in "Psychological Bulletin" from 1995 to 2005 to describe meta-analyses in psychology, including examination of statistical power, Type I errors resulting from multiple comparisons, and model choice. Retrospective power estimates indicated that univariate categorical and continuous moderators, individual…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Effect Size, Sampling, Psychology
Peer reviewedEveritt, B. S. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1981
Results show that the proposed sampling distribution of the test appears to be appropriate only for sample sizes above 50, and for data where the sample size is 10 times the number of variables. For such cases the power of the test is found to be fairly low. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Mathematical Formulas, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariate Analysis

Direct link
