Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| NASSP Bulletin | 13 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBigham, Gary D.; Riney, Mark R. – NASSP Bulletin, 2017
To meet the constantly changing needs of schools and diverse learners, educators must frequently monitor student learning, revise curricula, and improve instruction. Consequently, it is critical that careful analyses of student performance data are ongoing components of curriculum decision-making processes. The primary purpose of this study is to…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Educational Improvement, Decision Making, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewedIrvine, David J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1971
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Responsibility, Decision Making Skills, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedKimball, Roland B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
A typology of evaluation techniques intended to help school personnel to compare and contrast various approaches. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Classification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHeadrick, Mark L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
Information on former students is required by state and federal laws and is necessary for administrators attempting to evaluate school programs. Some points to consider in organizing a follow-up program are presented. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Followup Studies, Information Utilization
Peer reviewedZakrajsek, Barbra – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
Fifteen models for evaluating the principal are presented and the strengths and weaknesses of their components are analyzed. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHickey, M. E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1973
Author gives thourough treatment to alternatives evaluation purposes and problems. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewedNicholson, Everett W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Evaluation of the principal is in great demand in this era of accountability. The author suggests that principals take an offensive position by developing their own evaluative criteria. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Behavioral Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedRammer, Robert A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
A recent literature review and field survey on administrator evaluation disclosed disappointing results. There is uniform agreement that building administrator evaluations should be conducted by the superintendent and that general behavior categories might be examined. The literature is silent regarding definitive format. Researchers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedKatims, David S.; Henderson, Richard L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Standardized teacher appraisal instruments are generally not designed to evaluate the specialized instructional practices of teachers working with exceptional students. By incorporating the model described in this article, teacher evaluators can use their state-mandated system and meet these teachers' need for equitable consideration. Includes 10…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Job Performance
Peer reviewedStrathe, Marlene I. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
A survey of 78 high school teachers indicates skills related to communicating evaluation information and assessing cognitive achievement are most desirable and useful. Skills related to the statistical analysis of evaluation information were rated least useful, indicating a need for the inservice training of teachers in measurement and evaluation.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Inservice Teacher Education, Measurement Techniques
Peterson, Kenneth – NASSP Bulletin, 2004
Research literature highlights the principal as central to teacher evaluation. However, principal reports do not provide adequate information to document teacher quality. Good teacher evaluation adds multiple data sources such as client surveys, peer reviews of materials, and pupil achievement data, which vary by teacher and setting. Principals…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Principals, Teacher Effectiveness, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedPurves, Alan C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
A school and community must state their goals for students and then, avoiding the use of commerical tests, design a means of evaluation to determine if those goals have been met. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Accountability, Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedStuder, Jeannine R.; Sommers, Judith A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
Too often school counselors are evaluated through a teacher-assessment process bearing little relevance to (poorly defined) counseling tasks or roles. Evaluation is hindered by lack of a developmental model and by administrative pressures to perform tasks outside counselors' training and experience. Improvement measures are outlined. (Contains 16…
Descriptors: Accountability, Counselor Evaluation, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education
