NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Source
NASSP Bulletin18
Location
Texas1
Wisconsin1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Teacher Examinations1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bigham, Gary D.; Riney, Mark R. – NASSP Bulletin, 2017
To meet the constantly changing needs of schools and diverse learners, educators must frequently monitor student learning, revise curricula, and improve instruction. Consequently, it is critical that careful analyses of student performance data are ongoing components of curriculum decision-making processes. The primary purpose of this study is to…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Educational Improvement, Decision Making, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crews, Carole – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Provides an evaluation model and outlines steps to take in planning for the evaluation process. Such planning and organizing ensures that the evaluation process is achieved systematically. (IRT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Guidelines, Program Development, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bickel, Lauri R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
When the four administrators at a Wisconsin high school indicated they would appreciate staff feedback about their performance, union representatives undertook the task of formalizing an evaluation agreement, developing an evaluation instrument, implementing the evaluation process, and reviewing assessment procedures. The instrument and written…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, High Schools, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baldwin, Grover H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
To defend the value of the educational program against outside disapproval and diminishing support, administrators need to be trained in systematic evaluation research. (WD)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hamann, James A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
Administrators at Edina-West Secondary School in Edina (Minnesota) are making the curriculum more specific through an integrated in-service evaluation plan. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Equal Education, Evaluation Methods, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kline, Charles E.; McGrew, C. Daniel – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
This article's thesis is that the principal, as instructional leader, should be responsible for the educative effectiveness of the "third curriculum", defined here as the student activities program. (Editor)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Definitions, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Melvin, Arthur I.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Discusses a program developed by the Century III Foundation, which attempts to interject value analysis in the educational process. Includes a diagrammatic presentation of a Moral Valuing Paradigm. (MD)
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beebe, Robert J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Discusses development of the six components of any sound performance appraisal program: (1) explicit job descriptions, (2) definitions of key areas of responsibility, (3) criteria for performance appraisal, (4) methods for data collection and analysis, (5) written procedures, and (6) legal review of all procedures. (PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Personnel Evaluation, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buser, Robert L.; Banks, Freddie A., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Superintendents, principals, and teachers were surveyed to determine attitudes about principal evaluation. Findings include agreement that superintendents should be evaluators, that assistance in professional growth is the purpose, and overall agreement that evaluation of educational leaders should be done by educators. (MD)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DePasquale, Daniel, Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Teachers with higher order needs benefit from expressing their creativity and exercising valued skills. The evaluation process should encourage experienced teachers to grow professionally and move toward self-actualization. The suggested evaluation model includes an evaluation conference, a choice of evaluation method, a planning conference, an…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Models, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dorn, Charles M. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Discusses problems in evaluating artistic ability, changing views on the appropriate content and methods for art education, and new research that reveals relationships between artistic and other intellectual abilities; briefly notes several studies on art programs for the gifted and talented. (MCG)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Art Education, Creativity, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schafer, Paul J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Author Challenges the vociferous critics that he feels have grossly exaggerated the causes for concern in the American school system. (Editor)
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Education, Educational Development, Educational Status Comparison
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carlson, Robert; Mable, Ted – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Evaluation, if not carefully planned and implemented, can do more harm than good. Describes a successful system used to monitor one recent educational innovation. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Anrig, Gregory R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
A new computer-based assessment system will replace the National Teachers Examination by fall 1992. The three-stage system will test state-required basic academic skills during the sophomore year of college, evaluate subject field knowledge and skills using open-ended and multiple-choice questions, and contain a locally based performance…
Descriptors: Administrators, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Certification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mojkowski, Charles – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
A curriculum implementation monitoring system should be relatively inexpensive, unburdensome for faculty, and improvement oriented; produce information to guide staff development; and refrain from covertly evaluating teachers. A self-assessment checklist should report teachers' perceptions about degree of implementation, difficulty level, and…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Check Lists, Committees, Curriculum Development
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2