NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kline, Charles E.; McGrew, C. Daniel – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
This article's thesis is that the principal, as instructional leader, should be responsible for the educative effectiveness of the "third curriculum", defined here as the student activities program. (Editor)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Definitions, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mattaliano, Anthony P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Author stresses the principal's role in developing and writing objectives for a school's program, as well as his relationship to others in the organization. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Administrator Role, Educational Objectives, Educational Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vornberg, James A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
Offers recommendations about how to evaluate student activity programs. (JM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Extracurricular Activities, Objectives, Organization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trump, J. Lloyd – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Author recommends the use of DPIE (diagnosis-prescription-implementation-evaluation) in learning situations. (GB)
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Educational Improvement, Educational Objectives, Educational Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nicholson, Everett W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Evaluation of the principal is in great demand in this era of accountability. The author suggests that principals take an offensive position by developing their own evaluative criteria. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Behavioral Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Iwanicki, Edward F. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Evaluation continues to be a common concern at the secondary school level. Administrators and teachers are interested in the skill and ability levels of their students. Takes a careful look at the evaluation process. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Lewis R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Discusses characteristics of four common administrator evaluation procedures: management by objectives, traditional rating scales, self-evaluation, and administrator outcomes models. Outlines three broad responsibility areas for special-education administrators that warrant evaluation. Introduces a comprehensive, team-based model that begins with…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Purves, Alan C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
A school and community must state their goals for students and then, avoiding the use of commerical tests, design a means of evaluation to determine if those goals have been met. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Accountability, Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Matczynski, Thomas J.; Rogus, Joseph – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
By using the deductive or the inductive approach to needs assessment, or a combination of both approaches, school administrators can allocate physical or human resources in accordance with community priorities. (DCS)
Descriptors: Community Attitudes, Community Involvement, Community Support, Deduction