Descriptor
| Block Scheduling | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Action Research | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Influences | 1 |
| Parent Attitudes | 1 |
| Program Descriptions | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| NASSP Bulletin | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedQueen, J. Allen; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
An evaluation of the 4 X 4 block schedule used in three North Carolina high schools elicited strong support from teachers, students, and parents. Schools planning to implement this model should review D. G. Hackman's guidelines covering faculty input, feedback procedures, training opportunities, teacher fatigue, holidays, classroom monitoring,…
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Guidelines, High Schools, Parent Attitudes
Peer reviewedEineder, Dale V.; Bishop, Harold L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
An Ohio high school staff's action-research project examined effects of a recently implemented block-scheduling arrangement on student achievement, behavior, and student-teacher relations. Results support other research: students earned higher grade point averages, more students attained the honor roll, disciplinary referrals were reduced,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Action Research, Block Scheduling, Educational Benefits
