NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reiels, James O. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Paper considered alternate possibilities that involve action learning. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Conference Reports, Counselor Role, Educational Objectives, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brockmann, Fred J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Comparison of program budgeting with traditional budgeting systems. (SP)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Program Budgeting, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, Paul D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Proposes questions that can be raised by principals evaluating the character and effectiveness of their high schools. Suggests studying the nature of daily school operations, the school program, the school's structure and schedule, student activities, staff quality, guidance services, off-campus learning opportunities, administration, and school…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Evaluation Methods, High Schools, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wiley, Richard E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
States that the role of the Federal Communications Commission should be to provide direction and encouragement for the television networks to adopt self-regulatory reforms, rather than to provide strict regulation itself. The "family viewing" plan is a result of the networks' attempts at self-regulation. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Commercial Television, Critical Thinking, Government Role, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pugh, Nathaniel, Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
A description of evaluation of the experimental schools operated by the Berkeley (Calif.) Unified School District. (RB)
Descriptors: Cultural Awareness, Educational Principles, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gillies, Warna D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
Fourth-generation program evaluation is a collaborative, responsive approach that attaches great importance to the claims, concerns, and issues set forth by various stakeholders. This model stresses value pluralism and has several community-involvement phases: planning, data collection, results, final evaluation report, and follow-up. (20…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Change Agents, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Seidl, Kent – NASSP Bulletin, 1994
Compared to other subject areas, the arts seem more difficult to classify and evaluate. However, the arts' methods and content place them at the forefront of evaluation techniques that are beginning to permeate academic subject areas. Effective evaluation of arts programs depends not on principals' artistic expertise but on their ability to manage…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Role, Art Education, Institutional Mission
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewellen, James R.; Nagy, Barbara Pashos – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Students can succeed in remedial programs if such programs are well-planned and systematic, say these writers, who offer some guidelines. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Objectives, Instructional Materials, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hurwitz, Al – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
In attempting to answer the question posed in the title, this author offers an overview of the goals of arts programs and some general guidelines for administrators to follow in evaluating those programs. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Art Education, Demonstration Programs, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Terrill, Jerry L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Over the years, school counseling has transcended its traditional vocational guidance function. Various trends and themes in school counseling are explored, including information access and use, prevention versus remediation issues, environmental engineering challenges, professional adaptability and change, and creation of school support systems…
Descriptors: Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Evaluation, Educational Environment, Educational Trends