NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roseland, Denise; Volkov, Boris B.; Callow-Heusser, Catherine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In contrast to typical National Science Foundation program evaluations, the Utah State Math Science Partnership-Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance Project (MSP-RETA) provided technical assistance (TA) in two forms: direct TA for up to 10 projects a year, and professional development sessions for a larger number of project staff. Not…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Mathematics, Sciences, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toal, Stacie A.; Gullickson, Arlen R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1999, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded funds to the Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University to conduct an external evaluation of the Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program. ATE, a federally mandated program designed to increase the number and quality of skilled technicians in the U.S. workforce, has funded over 346…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Technology Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nord, Derek – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
With the vast array of contextual factors, pedagogical approaches, models of implementation, and purposes of education and training related to online learning, educators, learners, and the general public alike are seeking answers regarding utility and effectiveness of online learning. This article identifies and responds to many of the challenges…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Online Courses, Computer Uses in Education, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greenseid, Lija O.; Lawrenz, Frances – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A team at the University of Minnesota conducted the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation between 1999 and 2004. The purpose of the CETP core evaluation was to achieve consensus among CETP project leaders and project evaluators on evaluation questions; to develop, pilot, and field test evaluation instruments…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Teacher Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lambur, Michael T. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
This chapter explores how the structure of large complex organizations such as Cooperative Extension affects their ability to support internal evaluation of their programs and activities. Following a literature review of organizational structure and its relation to internal evaluation capacity, the chapter presents the results of interviews with…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Extension Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braverman, Marc T.; Arnold, Mary E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Methodological rigor consists of a series of elements that, in combination, determine the confidence with which conclusions can be drawn from the evaluation results. These elements include evaluation design, conceptualization of constructs, measurement strategies, time frames, program integrity, and others. The authors examine the factors that…
Descriptors: Information Needs, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas; McGinnis, J. Randy – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the authors examine evaluation process use in a large multilevel, multisite core evaluation. This case highlights the nature of the evaluation processes of the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation in terms of four categories: (1) social processing; (2) engagement; (3) involvement; and (4)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taylor-Powell, Ellen; Boyd, Heather H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Evaluation capacity building, or ECB, is an area of great interest within the field of evaluation as well as in Extension evaluation. Internal Extension evaluators have long offered training and technical assistance to help Extension educators conduct evaluation. Today ECB in Extension encompasses myriad activities and processes to advance…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Models, Organizational Change, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huffman, Douglas; Lawrenz, Frances; Thomas, Kelli; Clarkson, Lesa – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
Building the evaluation capacity of K-12 schools is clearly an important goal for the field of evaluation, especially in the current educational environment, which is dominated by issues of accountability and high-stakes testing. The focus on student achievement has forced schools to become more data-driven as they attempt to analyze test scores…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Graduate Students, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C.; DeStefano, Lizanne; Burgon, Holli; Hall, Jori – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
There is concern that the nation's schools are not preparing students to excel in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. At both precollege and postsecondary levels, much effort is needed to create and implement powerful STEM curricula, prepare and support highly qualified teachers, deliver effective instruction, and give…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Program Effectiveness, Program Improvement, Educational Experience