NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)49
Source
New Directions for Evaluation126
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 126 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feinstein, Osvaldo Nestor – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
Evaluation of programs or projects is often perceived as a threat. This is to a great extent related to the anticipated use of evaluation for accountability, which is often prioritized at the expense of using evaluation as a learning tool. Frequently it is argued that there is a trade-off between these two evaluation functions. An alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Accountability, Program Evaluation, Research Tools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; Vo, Anne T.; Christie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The act of valuing in an evaluation may be perceived in different ways. We consider the multiple theoretic perspectives that govern an evaluator's behavior and present a typology of evaluator valuing roles. Within this typology we describe three ways in which value judgments are typically reached--by stakeholders alone, stakeholders and evaluators…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Classification, Value Judgment, Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martinic, Sergio – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The aim of this chapter is to characterize educational reforms in Latin America over the last 25 years, and the way they reflect the role, method, and use of evaluation processes. The main theoretical and methodological tensions that are created by the development of evaluations will be reviewed, concluding with the identification of some of the…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Educational Change, Foreign Countries, Educational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roseland, Denise; Volkov, Boris B.; Callow-Heusser, Catherine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In contrast to typical National Science Foundation program evaluations, the Utah State Math Science Partnership-Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance Project (MSP-RETA) provided technical assistance (TA) in two forms: direct TA for up to 10 projects a year, and professional development sessions for a larger number of project staff. Not…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Mathematics, Sciences, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goodyear, Leslie K. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
New and novel uses of evaluation processes and findings are possible when a community of practice develops as evaluation stakeholders participate in multisite evaluations in multiple ways. Developing such communities takes advantage of what makes multisite evaluations special. This chapter uses the example of the Innovative Technology Experiences…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, STEM Education, Communities of Practice, Learning Resources Centers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nord, Derek – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
With the vast array of contextual factors, pedagogical approaches, models of implementation, and purposes of education and training related to online learning, educators, learners, and the general public alike are seeking answers regarding utility and effectiveness of online learning. This article identifies and responds to many of the challenges…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Online Courses, Computer Uses in Education, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zantal-Wiener, Kathy; Horwood, Thomas J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2010
The authors propose a comprehensive evaluation framework to prepare for evaluating school emergency management programs. This framework involves a logic model that incorporates Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures as a foundation for comprehensive evaluation that complements performance monitoring used by the U.S. Department of…
Descriptors: Models, Logical Thinking, Emergency Programs, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Case studies about managing evaluation are examined for perspectives on expertise in managing evaluation. There are lessons on a geography of managing, managing as organizational work, the notions of "competency" and "expertise," and managing evaluation as professional work. Dreyfus and Dreyfus (2004) offer a framework for an introductory…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Expertise, Program Evaluation, Administrative Principles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baizerman, Michael – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Depth, resonance, and shadow are added to how the expertise of managing evaluation could be grasped and understood. Returning to the notion of "competency" (Stevahn, King, Ghere, & Minnema, 2005), this is contrasted more deeply with Dreyfus and Dreyfus's (2004) conception of expert and to its use in nursing by Benner (2004; Benner, Tanner, &…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Organizational Theories, Expertise
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mabry, Linda – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
As an outgrowth of No Child Left Behind's narrow definition of scientifically based research, the priority given to certain quantitative evaluation designs has sparked debate among those in the evaluation community. Federal mandates for particular evaluation methodologies run counter to evaluation practice and to the direction of most evaluation…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Evaluation Methods, Scientific Research, International Organizations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kniker, Ted – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
This chapter describes the author's experience and insights as the chief of evaluation for public diplomacy at the U.S. Department of State, and as a consultant assisting federal agencies in a multitude of evaluation activities relating what helps and hinders internal evaluation functions. The article discusses the challenges faced by the internal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, International Relations, Public Agencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Volkov, Boris B. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
This chapter features a recent conversation with Dr. Arnold J. Love, a long-time proponent of internal evaluation and one of the most cited internal evaluation authors. In 1983, Love edited the first issue of "New Directions for Program Evaluation" on the topic of internal evaluation. He is the author of the book "Internal…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Evaluation, Interviews, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Here the essentials of the expertise of managing are presented as orientation toward (ethos, stance, and gaze), knowledge about, and knowledge how-to ("know-how"). These are grounded to specific content, summarized, and then connected to a typology of managing evaluation. The orienting questions for the field are reviewed to reveal what it means…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Career Development, Program Evaluation, Organizational Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eddy, Rebecca M.; Berry, Tiffany – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The field of evaluation faces a number of serious challenges in light of No Child Left Behind legislation, among them feasibility, resources, and blurring lines among research, evaluation, and assessment. At the same time, these challenges open the door for opportunities in evaluation. Now more than ever, the expertise of evaluators is needed and…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Donald W. Compton, the first director of evaluation services at the National Home Office (Atlanta) of the American Cancer Society, tells the story of building the unit in conditions of high demand and a limited budget. Along the way, evaluation was brought to regional divisions and to local offices in part as a response to United Way and to his…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Research
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9