Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Case Studies | 33 |
Evaluation Methods | 33 |
Program Evaluation | 27 |
Evaluators | 8 |
Models | 7 |
Research Design | 7 |
Evaluation Research | 6 |
Evaluation Utilization | 4 |
Participation | 4 |
Stakeholders | 4 |
Context Effect | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Evaluation | 33 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 33 |
Reports - Evaluative | 16 |
Reports - Descriptive | 10 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 2 |
Colorado | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Toal, Stacie A.; Gullickson, Arlen R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1999, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded funds to the Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University to conduct an external evaluation of the Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program. ATE, a federally mandated program designed to increase the number and quality of skilled technicians in the U.S. workforce, has funded over 346…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Technology Education
Lawrenz, Frances; King, Jean A.; Ooms, Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A cross-case analysis of four National Science Foundation (NSF) case studies identified both unique details and common themes related to promoting the use and influence of multisite evaluations. The analysis provided evidence of diverse evaluation use by stakeholders and suggested that people taking part in the multisite evaluations perceived…
Descriptors: Role Perception, Participation, Case Studies, Program Evaluation
Johnson, Kelli; Weiss, Iris R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Research
Baizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Case studies about managing evaluation are examined for perspectives on expertise in managing evaluation. There are lessons on a geography of managing, managing as organizational work, the notions of "competency" and "expertise," and managing evaluation as professional work. Dreyfus and Dreyfus (2004) offer a framework for an introductory…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Expertise, Program Evaluation, Administrative Principles
Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
Donald W. Compton, the first director of evaluation services at the National Home Office (Atlanta) of the American Cancer Society, tells the story of building the unit in conditions of high demand and a limited budget. Along the way, evaluation was brought to regional divisions and to local offices in part as a response to United Way and to his…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Research
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs
Yin, Robert K.; Davis, Darnella – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
This chapter describes the adaptation of the case study method to assessing increasingly complex, comprehensive reform initiatives that highlight the blurring of the boundaries between phenomenon and context and the concurrence of multiple interventions. Completed studies of two education reform programs illustrate the ongoing challenges of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Educational Change, Case Studies, Context Effect

Baizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W.; Stockdill, Stacey Hueftle – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Summarizes and analyzes the four case studies of this theme issue. The analyses consider the three structural elements of evaluation capacity building (ECB): overall ECB process; actual ECB practices; and ECB occupational orientation and practitioner role. Provides a practical checklist for assessing ECB at an organization and a framework for…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation

Milstein, Bobby; Chapel, Thomas J.; Wetterhall, Scott F.; Cotton, David A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Summarizes efforts to strengthen program evaluation capacity at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reviews the circumstances that triggered an interest in building this capacity in public health and the principles and procedures used by the working group charged to achieve this goal. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Public Health

Caracelli, Valerie J.; Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Two broad classes of mixed-method designs--component and integrated--that have the potential to combine elements of different inquiry traditions are described. The conceptual ideas advanced in the first chapter are illustrated through selected examples of several mixed-method integrated models. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation

Datta, Lois-ellin – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
A pragmatic framework for making decisions about mixed-method designs is proposed and then applied to illustrative evaluation case studies to help identify the strengths and limitations of making practical, contextual, and consequential considerations a primary basis for evaluation design decisions. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation

Compton, Donald W.; Glover-Kudon, Rebecca; Smith, Iris E.; Avery, Mary Eden – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Describes how the first evaluation practitioner for the American Cancer Society (ACS) came to do evaluation capacity building (ECB) because of the need for evaluation following changes in the organizational structure. Provides a brief history of these changes as a background for understanding the seven principles of ECB at the ACS. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Organizational Change

Torres, Rosalie T.; Preskill, Hallie – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Reviews critical dimensions in evaluation that emerge from efforts to promote use within a context of stakeholder participation. Case examples illustrate two potentially problematic domains: stakeholder selection and depth of stakeholder involvement. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization

Ryan, Katherine E.; Johnson, Trav D. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses the results of an instrumental case study to identify issues connected to evaluation participation and its representation and the role of the internal evaluator in democratic, deliberative evaluation. Identified direct participation and participation by representation, sanctioned or unsanctioned representation, and extrinsic and intrinsic…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Incentives

MacNeil, Cheryl – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses a case study of an evaluation conducted in a psychiatric institution to illustrate the issues that arise when techniques of deliberative democratic evaluation are applied in an antidemocratic climate. Illuminates strategies for stakeholder inclusion from a deliberative, democratic point of view. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Psychiatric Hospitals